Background: Individuals with severe neurological disabilities but preserved cognition, including children, are often precluded from connecting with their environments. Brain computer interfaces (BCI) are a potential solution where advancing technologies create new clinical opportunities. We evaluated clinician awareness as a modifiable barrier to progress and identified eligible populations. Methods: We executed a national, population-based, cross-sectional survey of physician specialists caring for persons with severe disability. An evidence-and experience-based survey had three themes: clinician BCI knowledge, eligible populations, and potential impact. A BCI knowledge index was created and scored. Canadian adult and pediatric neurologists, physiatrists and a subset of developmental pediatricians were contacted. Secure, web-based software administered the survey via email with online data collection. Results: Of 922 valid emails (664 neurologists, 253 physiatrists), 137 (15%) responded. One third estimated that ≥10% of their patients had severe neurological disability with cognitive capacity. BCI knowledge scores were low with > 40% identifying as less than "vaguely aware" and only 15% as "somewhat familiar" or better. Knowledge did not differ across specialties. Only 6 physicians (4%) had patients using BCI. Communication and wheelchair control rated highest for potentially improving quality of life. Most (81%) felt BCI had high potential to improve quality of life. Estimates suggested that > 13,000 Canadians (36 M population) might benefit from BCI technologies. Conclusions: Despite high potential and thousands of patients who might benefit, BCI awareness among clinicians caring for disabled persons is poor. Further, functional priorities for BCI applications may differ between medical professionals and potential BCI users, perhaps reflecting that clinicians possess a less accurate understanding of the desires and needs of potential end-users. Improving knowledge and engaging both clinicians and patients could facilitate BCI program development to improve patient outcomes.

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an excellent model for studying potential intraoperative cerebral ischemia under controlled physiological conditions and, accordingly, many different monitoring techniques have been employed over many years, giving rise to an extensive literature on the subject. Techniques for monitoring include local anaesthesia with the ABSTRACT: Objective: To prospectively compare somatosensory evoked potentials, electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) for detection of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods: Somatosensory evoked potentials and EEG recordings were attempted in 156 consecutive CEAs and TCD was also attempted in 91 of them. Recordings from all three modalities were obtained for at least 10 minutes before CEA, during CEAand for at least 15 minutes after CEA. Somatosensory evoked potentials peak-to-peak amplitude decrease of >50%, EEG amplitude decrease of >75%, and ipsilateral middle cerebral artery mean blood flow velocity (mean V MCAi ) decrease >75% persisting for the entire period of internal carotid artery occlusion were individually considered to be diagnostic of cerebral ischemia. Clinical neurological examination was performed immediately prior to surgery and following recovery from general anaesthesia. Results: Somatosensory evoked potentials, EEG, and TCD were successfully obtained throughout the entire period of internal carotid artery occlusion in 99%, 95%, and 63% of patients respectively. Two patients (1.3%) suffered intraoperative cerebral infarction detected by clinical neurological examination and subsequent magnetic resonance imaging. Somatosensory evoked potentials accurately predicted intraoperative cerebral infarction in both instances without false negatives or false positives, EEG yielded one false negative result and no false positive results and V MCAi one true positive, four false positive and no false negative results. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound detection of emboli did not correlate with postoperative neurological deficits. Nevertheless the sensitivity and specificity of each test was not significantly different than the others because of the small number of disagreements between tests. Conclusion: A >50% decrease in the cortically generated P25 amplitude of the median somatosensory evoked potentials, which persisted during the entire period of internal carotid artery occlusion, appears to be the most reliable method of monitoring for intraoperative ischemia in our hands because it accurately detected both intraoperative strokes with no false positive or false negative results. On a considéré qu'il existait de l'ischémie cérébrale si l'amplitude de pic à pic des potentiels évoqués somesthésiques était diminuée de plus de 50%, l'amplitude ÉEG était diminuée de plus de 75% ou la vélocité moyenne du flot sanguin de l'artère cérébrale moyenne ipsilatérale (VACMi) était diminuée de plus de 75% pendant toute la durée de l'occlusion de la carotide interne. Un examen neurologique a été fait immédiatement...

Peripheral nerve graft repair after severe brachial plexus injury is futile if there is degeneration of motor fibers in the proximal nerve stump to which the graft must be attached. Traditional intraoperative neurophysiological assessment methods like nerve action potential (NAP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring have been used to evaluate proximal nerve stump integrity, but these methods do not allow evaluation of the integrity of motor fibers back to the anterior horn cell. Consequently, the authors used transcranial electrical stimulation and recorded neurogenic motor evoked potentials (MEPs) directly from the brachial plexus in a patient undergoing surgical repair of a complete upper brachial plexus injury (Erb palsy) to assess the functional continuity of motor fibers. In addition, selected elements of the brachial plexus were directly stimulated, and NAPs were recorded. Finally, SSEPs were recorded from the scalp after stimulation of selected elements of the brachial plexus. Neurogenic MEPs were present from the medial cord of the brachial plexus, but not the middle or upper trunk; NAPs were present from the lateral and posterior cords after middle trunk stimulation, but absent after upper trunk stimulation; and SSEPs were present after medial cord stimulation but absent after stimulation of the upper and middle trunks. For the first time, neurogenic MEPs were coupled with NAPs and SSEPs to evaluate successfully the functional status of motor fibers back to the anterior horn cell for accurate localization of the lesion sites.