The authority of governance in Papua Province through Act No. 21 of 2001 is very large, as stipulated in Article 4 paragraph (1), which covering all fields of government, except with regard to foreign affairs, defense and security, monetary and fiscal, religion, and justice, and except with regard to a particular field. In addition to the authority, the authority of Papua Province added with partial authority of the Government called a special authority as provided in paragraph (2) is the authority in the field of foreign policy, defense and security, monetary and fiscal, justice and religion. This authority, causing some people argues that leads to form a federal state and also may lead to the disintegration of nation. The assessment object with regard to the substance of Act No. 21 of 2001 that opposed to the concept of a unitary state, and designing a special autonomy of Papua in accordance with the principles of the Republic of Indonesia, by using juridical-normative. The result indicates that the special autonomy through Act No. 21 of 2001 does not conflict with the concept of a unitary state; it strengthens Papuan into the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. Design of special autonomy in accordance with the principles of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia that gives special powers to the province of Papua in the form of delegation of authority is clear and explicit to the Province of Papua through the implementation of devolution theory and delegation of authority from the provincial to the district/cities through the implementation of real household teachings.

The granting of Special Autonomy is to realize justice, uphold the rule of law, implement human rights (HAM), accelerate economic development, improve the welfare and progress of the Papuan people in order to realize and balance the progress of other provinces. The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze the Affirmation Policy in the field of employment in meeting the needs of qualified employees. The method used is normative legal research to be able to solve problems by examining secondary data. Secondary data is obtained by studying and reviewing library materials in the form of legal materials, both primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. presented descriptively. The results of this study are the need for a clear and responsible juridical basis in the implementation of special regional staffing fields, namely by making special Provincial regulations and Regency Regional Regulations.

Introduction: Pretrial is the initial thought to carry out supervisory actions against law enforcement officials so that in carrying out or carrying out their duties there is no abuse of authority.Purposes of the Research: To review and analyze Pre-Trial As Investigation Process Control System.Methods of the Research: The research method used in this study is Empirical Juridical law research with the reason that the author wants to examine norms related to pretrial and seek information directly about the implementation of pretrial at the Merauke Merauke Police.Results of the Research: Pretrial is a form of control both from superiors (Vertical) as well as from fellow law enforcers or third parties, namely the attorneys of suspects, suspects and their families (Horizontal) to see that the arrest, detention and determination of suspects are in accordance with applicable rules and pretrial. must have rules regarding inspection techniques so that there is uniformity.