In PD peritonitis that is long standing, recurrent, or not responsive to therapy, MBEC testing should be considered as a biofilm may be present. Gentamicin should be strongly considered over other agents for empiric gram-negative coverage as it may be providing synergy in the setting of Staphylococcus aureus. Also, the newer anti-staphylococcal drugs should be tested for their performance in a biofilm using the MBEC method.

No abstract

Purpose:The purpose of this article is to update the previously published consensus recommendations from March 2017 discussing the optimal management of adult patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). This document focuses on recent developments in genetic testing, renal imaging, assessment of risk regarding disease progression, and pharmacological treatment options for ADPKD.Sources of information:Published literature was searched in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify the latest evidence related to the treatment and management of ADPKD.Methods:All pertinent articles were reviewed by the authors to determine if a new recommendation was required, or if the previous recommendation needed updating. The consensus recommendations were developed by the authors based on discussion and review of the evidence.Key findings:The genetics of ADPKD are becoming more complex with the identification of new and rarer genetic variants such as GANAB. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) continue to be the main imaging modalities used to evaluate ADPKD. Total kidney volume (TKV) continues to be the most validated and most used measure to assess disease progression. Since the publication of the previous consensus recommendations, the use of the Mayo Clinic Classification for prognostication purposes has been validated in patients with class 1 ADPKD. Recent evidence supports the benefits of a low-osmolar diet and dietary sodium restriction in patients with ADPKD. Evidence from the Replicating Evidence of Preserved Renal Function: an Investigation of Tolvaptan Safety and Efficacy in ADPKD (REPRISE) trial supports the use of ADH (antidiuretic hormone) receptor antagonism in patients with ADPKD 18 to 55 years of age with eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) of 25 to 65 mL/min/1.73 m2 or 56 to 65 years of age with eGFR of 25 to 44 mL/min/1.73 m2 with historical evidence of a decline in eGFR >2.0 mL/min/1.73 m2/year.Limitations:Available literature was limited to English language publications and to publications indexed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar.Implications:Advances in the assessment of the risk of disease progression include the validation of the Mayo Clinic Classification for patients with class 1 ADPKD. Advances in the pharmacological management of ADPKD include the expansion of the use of ADH receptor antagonism in patients 18 to 55 years of age with eGFR of 25 to 65 mL/min/1.73 m2 or 56 to 65 years of age with eGFR of 25 to 44 mL/min/1.73 m2 with historical evidence of a decline in eGFR >2.0 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, as per the results of the REPRISE study.

Purpose of the reviewPatients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at a high risk of bacterial infection. We reviewed publications on risk factors, prevention, and treatment paradigms, as well as outcomes associated with bacterial infection in end-stage kidney disease. We focused in particular on studies conducted in Canada where rates of haemodialysis catheter use are high.Sources of informationWe included original research articles in English text identified from MEDLINE using search terms ‘chronic kidney failure’, ‘renal dialysis’, or ‘chronic renal insufficiency’, and ‘bacterial infection’. We focused on articles with Canadian study populations and included comparisons to international standards and outcomes where possible.FindingsBacterial infections in this setting are most commonly due to Gram-positive skin flora, particularly Staphylococcus, with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrying a poorer prognosis. Interventions that may decrease mortality from sepsis include a collaborative care model that includes a nephrology team, an infectious disease specialist, and use of standardized care bundles that adhere to proven quality-of-care indicators. Decreased infectious mortality may be achieved by ensuring appropriate antibiotic selection and dosing as well as avoiding catheter salvage attempts. Reduction in bloodstream infection (BSI) incidence has been observed with the use of tPA catheter-locking solutions and the use of mupirocin or polysporin as a topical agent at the catheter exit site, as well as implementing standarized hygiene protocols during catheter use.LimitationsThere has been a paucity of randomized controlled trials of prevention and treatment strategies for catheter-related BSIs in haemodialysis. Some past trials have been limited by lack of blinding and short duration of follow-up. Microbiological epidemiology, although well characterized, may vary by region and treatment centre.ImplicationsWith the high prevalence of catheter use in Canadian haemodialysis units, further studies on long-term treatment and preventative strategies for BSI are warranted.