The PathoSystems Resource Integration Center (PATRIC) is one of eight Bioinformatics Resource Centers (BRCs) funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infection Diseases (NIAID) to create a data and analysis resource for selected NIAID priority pathogens, specifically proteobacteria of the genera Brucella, Rickettsia and Coxiella, and corona-, calici- and lyssaviruses and viruses associated with hepatitis A and E. The goal of the project is to provide a comprehensive bioinformatics resource for these pathogens, including consistently annotated genome, proteome and metabolic pathway data to facilitate research into counter-measures, including drugs, vaccines and diagnostics. The project's curation strategy has three prongs: ‘breadth first’ beginning with whole-genome and proteome curation using standardized protocols, a ‘targeted’ approach addressing the specific needs of researchers and an integrative strategy to leverage high-throughput experimental data (e.g. microarrays, proteomics) and literature. The PATRIC infrastructure consists of a relational database, analytical pipelines and a website which supports browsing, querying, data visualization and the ability to download raw and curated data in standard formats. At present, the site warehouses complete sequences for 17 bacterial and 332 viral genomes. The PATRIC website () will continually grow with the addition of data, analysis and functionality over the course of the project.
Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) quality is dependent on seed chemical composition, which in turn determines the benefits of its consumption for human health and nutrition. While mung bean is rich in a range of nutritional components, such as protein, carbohydrates and vitamins, it remains less well studied than other legume crops in terms of micronutrients. In addition, mung bean genomics and genetic resources are relatively sparse. The objectives of this research were threefold , namely: to develop a genome-wide marker system for mung bean based on genotyping by sequencing (GBS), to evaluate diversity of mung beans available to breeders in the United States and finally, to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for nutrient concentrations based on a seven mineral analysis using inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectroscopy. All parts of our research were performed with 95 cultivated mung bean genotypes chosen from the USDA core collection representing accessions from 13 countries. Overall, we identified a total of 6,486 high quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the GBS dataset and found 43 marker × trait associations (MTAs) with calcium, iron, potassium, manganese, phosphorous, sulfur or zinc concentrations in mung bean grain produced in either of two consecutive years' field experiments. The MTAs were scattered across 35 genomic regions explaining on average 22% of the variation for each seed nutrient in each year. Most of the gene regions provided valuable candidate loci to use in future breeding of new varieties of mung bean and further the understanding of genetic control of nutritional properties in the crop. Other SNPs identified in this study will serve as important resources to enable marker-assisted selection (MAS) for nutritional improvement in mung bean and to analyze cultivars of mung bean.
8Five bacterial isolates collected from dogwood leaves were evaluated for powdery mildew control in 9 shadehouse and greenhouse environments by using foliar sprays and/or root drenching. Two 10 isolates displayed superior bioactivity and suppressed powdery mildew similar to conventional 11 fungicide thiophanate methyl (Cleary's 3336F®). The two bacteria disrupted powdery mildew spore 12 germination and ruptured spore membranes causing spore lyses. Bacterial filtrates without bacterial 13 cells were also effective in suppressing powdery mildew and disrupting spore germination and 14suggested the involvement of secondary metabolites. The two biocontrol agents (BCAs) colonized 15 roots endophytically and promoted plant growth. 16 17
Six biological control agents (BCAs) (two bacteria, two fungi, and two yeasts) that were previously shown to be effective against powdery mildew (Erysiphe pulchra) were tested for efficacy against Macrophomina phaseolina root rot on flowering dogwood (Cornus florida) in the greenhouse. Two of the bacterial isolates, Stenotrophomonas sp. (B17A) and Serratia sp. (B17B), were effective in controlling both macrophomina root rot and powdery mildew, similar to fungicide control thiophanate methyl, when roots were drenched with the six BCAs individually. In addition, the two bacterial BCAs improved plant growth with respect to stem diameter, stem length, dry weight, and green foliage compared with fungicide-treated plants or nontreated controls grown in sterile soil. These results confirm previous results in which B17A and B17B suppressed powdery mildew and also promoted plant growth in flowering dogwood. Although macrophomina root rot has been previously reported as a potential problem in flowering dogwood, especially in field conditions, simultaneous infection with macrophomina root rot and powdery mildew has not been previously reported. This study confirmed that M. phaseolina infection was characterized by stubby roots and black root lesions, and plants infected with both powdery mildew and macrophomina root rot had smaller root mass compared with fungicide-treated plants. Neither of the two pathogens killed their host plants, but compounded infections significantly reduced the plant root system and plant growth. The efficacy of the two bacterial isolates in controlling both powdery mildew and macrophomina root rot suggests their potential utilization in controlling both diseases in dogwood nursery production and in other plants that are hosts to both powdery mildew and macrophomina root rot. Plant growth promoted by the two BCAs may be attributed to powdery mildew and macrophomina root rot control, but comparisons between fungicide-treated plants and control plants not inoculated with BCAs or root rot pathogen suggested that the two BCAs may play a role as bio-stimulants in growth enhancement. These results also suggest that the two biocontrol agents are not phytotoxic to dogwood.
Garden hydrangea (Hydrangea macrophylla) is a popular ornamental plant that can be devastated by leaf-spot diseases. Information is needed to determine susceptibility of commercial cultivars to leaf-spot diseases. To address this need, 88 cultivars of H. macrophylla were evaluated for their resistance to leafspot diseases in full-shade (2007-2008), full-sun (2007-2008) and partial-shade (2009-2010) environments in McMinnville, TN, USA. Ten cultivars [ÔAmi PasquierÕ, ÔAyeshaÕ, ÔBlue BirdÕ, ÔForever PinkÕ, ÔFuji WaterfallÕ (ÔFujinotakiÕ), ÔMiyama-yae-MurasakiÕ, ÔSeafoamÕ, ÔTaubeÕ, ÔTricolorÕ and ÔVeitchiiÕ] were rated resistant (R) or moderately resistant to leaf spot under each of the three environments. In 2007-2008, approximately 51% of the cultivars were rated R in full shade, but only 5% were R in full sun. In 2009-2010, only 1% of the cultivars were rated R in partial shade. Although environmental parameters including temperature and rainfall influence disease severity and host reaction, a shaded environment was least favourable for leaf-spot disease development, which demonstrates that establishing hydrangea in shaded environment can be an effective tool along with cultivar selection for managing leaf-spot diseases on hydrangea. Six pathogens, Corynespora cassiicola, Cercospora spp., Myrothecium roridum, Glomerella cingulata (Anamorph: Colletotrichum gloeosporioides), Phoma exigua and Botrytis cinerea, were associated with leaf-spot diseases of garden hydrangea. Of the leaf-spot pathogens, C. cassiicola was most frequently isolated (55% of all isolates), followed by Cercospora spp. (20%) and other pathogens (25%). Because symptoms attributed to each leaf-spot pathogen were similar, cultivars were selected for resistance to multiple leaf-spot pathogens.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.