Our preliminary experience shows that the results of the laparoscopic approach are comparable to those of the open approach. However, the important advantages of laparoscopy over the open approach are its minimal invasiveness and precision of intervention. Moreover, laparoscopy allows treatment of other intra-abdominal pathological conditions using the same anesthesia, as in 10 patients in our series. We believe that ligating the testicular veins and artery is preferable to ligating the testicular veins only, even if the incidence of hydrocele is not negligible after the Palomo procedure.

No abstract

Our preliminary experience shows that the results of the laparoscopic approach are comparable to those of the open approach. However, the important advantages of laparoscopy over the open approach are its minimal invasiveness and precision of intervention. Moreover, laparoscopy allows treatment of other intra-abdominal pathological conditions using the same anesthesia, as in 10 patients in our series. We believe that ligating the testicular veins and artery is preferable to ligating the testicular veins only, even if the incidence of hydrocele is not negligible after the Palomo procedure.