Purpose: To provide a clinical case of recurrent keratoconus from our practice.Materials and method. A patient came to the clinic with a complaint of decreased visual acuity in the right eye. A series of standard instrumental examinations and Scheimpflug keratotopography were performed, and astigmatism of the right eye was diagnosed. Similar examinations were carried out during the patient’s attendance at follow-up examinations.Results. Based on the results of scanning Scheimpflug keratotopography, the diagnosis of keratoconus (forme fruste) was made. On examination after 1 year, there were no complaints of decreased visual acuity and data from the same instrumental examinations indicating keratoconus. After this examination, the patient came 3.5 years later with complaints of a new decreased visual acuity in the right eye. During instrumental examinations and keratopography, data were obtained indicating the presence of posterior keratoconus. After 1 year, a follow-up examination took place without complaints. The data of instrumental studies are identical to the previous visit; keratotopography revealed a decrease in posterior elevation.Discussion and conclusion. It was revealed that the patient was constantly taking the hydroxyurea drug against the background of systemic disease up to the 3rd visit, at the time of the 4th visit she had not taken it for 1 year. There are publications in the literature on the effect of this type of drugs on the collagen of the dermis of the skin, the type of which corresponds to the collagen of the cornea. We hypothesize that drugs may have an effect on the biomechanical properties of the cornea, which requires further in-depth study.
Purpose: to found the relationship between the obtained postoperative visual acuity, the increase in visual acuity in the lines and the subjective satisfaction of patients with the results of the operation.Material and methods. The study included 165 patients (186 eyes) who received cataract phacoemulsification surgery with IOL implantation (n = 170) or refractive lensectomy with IOL implantation (n = 16). The average age of the subjects was 70.23 ± 10.14 years. The group included patients without concomitant systemic or ophthalmic pathology, without previous surgical interventions in the eye for any purpose. At least 1 month after the operation, patients filled out a questionnaire in order to find out the subjective satisfaction with the treatment (scale from 0 to 4 points). The results of the questionnaire were compared with postoperative BCVA, and increased vision (postoperative BCVA — preoperative BCVA). Preoperative BCVA — Me 0.4 (Q1–Q3: 0.1–0.68), postoperative BCVA — Me 1.0 (Q1–Q3: 0.95–1.0), increased vision — Me 0.6 (Q1–Q3: 0.3–0.9) according to Snellen’s table.Results. Visual acuity in satisfaction subgroups: 0 points — Me 1.0 (Q1–Q3: 0.9–1.0) / n = 5 (2.7 %); 1 point — 1 case, postoperative BCVA 1.16 (0.5 %); 2 points — Me 0.95 (Q1–Q3: 0.84–1.0) / n = 14 (7.5 %); 3 points — Me 1.0 (Q1–Q3: 0.9–1.16) / n = 57 (30.6 %); 4 points — Me 1.0 (Q1–Q3: 0.96–1.0) / n = 109 (58.6 %). Postoperative BCVA and increased in visual acuity do not have statistically significant differences depending on satisfaction with treatment (p > 0.05). The correlation between postoperative BCVA and satisfaction is not statistically significant (p = 0.65; rxy = 0.136), as well as between vision improvement and satisfaction (p = 0.55; rxy = 0.141).Conclusion. There was a lack of a statistically significant relationship between postoperative BCVA and improved vision with subjective patient satisfaction with treatment. Identification of factors affecting subjective assessment requires a deeper analysis. Practicing ophthalmologists should remember the importance of the dialogue between the doctor and the patient at the preoperative stage, informing the patient about the expected results of the operation and the possible course after the operation period.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.