Introduction: Aortic dissection (AD) is the most common aortic emergency, result in a catastrophic outcome. Patients usually asymptomatic, some of them present with sudden severe, tearing or sharp back or anterior chest pain and haemodynamic disturbance. Early and accurate diagnosis and treatment determine the patient outcome.Case Report: A case of 40 years old man complained of acute, sharp, chest pain since 4 days before admission which worsen instead of medical treatment, with a history of smoking since a few years ago. A vital sign was within normal limit. Laboratory result showed high CKMB, troponin T, LDH result. Occasional ventricular extrasystoles and inferior ischaemic was found in the ECG examination. From echocardiography, the patient suspected to have aortic dissection Stanford type A since an intimal flap on ascending aorta was found, with left ventricle hypertrophy, dilatation of right atrium and right ventricle, severe aortic regurgitation, moderate mitral regurgitation, severe tricuspid regurgitation, moderate pulmonary regurgitation and moderate pulmonary hypertension. From plain radiography, the patient showed mediastinum widening and cardiomegaly, CT angiography showed Stanford type A aortic dissection (DeBakey type I).  The patient refused to seek further treatment for operation as suggested.Conclusion: It is still challenging to differentiate aortic dissection (AD) and another acute chest emergency. Since clinical presentation and laboratory result may be similar between those illnesses. Therefore careful history taking and further imaging examination should be considered to increase the patient outcome.

BACKGROUND: Anterior translation of the tibia (ATT) is a secondary sign of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. With advances in technology, new tools such as the Lachmeter are expected to replace computed tomography scanning (CT scan) in measuring the ATT. AIM: This study aims to determine the diagnostic validity of the Lachmeter in measuring the ATT 6–12 months after ACL tear reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective diagnostic test with a Lachmeter was used to measure ATT in patients 6–12 months after ACL tear reconstruction, compared with the gold standard CT scan and using a consecutive sampling technique. The optimal cutoff value of ATT was determined with Lachmeter afterwards. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 21.0 was used for the data analysis. RESULTS: There are 28 persons with a positive ATT (≥ 5 mm) and four people with a negative ATT (<5 mm) measured using CT scan out of 32 samples. The optimal cutoff of ATT with Lachmeter is ≥7.28 mm (Area under curve = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.67–1.00 and p = 0.004) with a sensitivity of 84.62%, specificity 83.33%, positive predictive value 95.65%, negative predictive value 55.56%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) 5.08, negative LR 0.18, and 84.38% accuracy. CONCLUSION: Lachmeter is a new tool for determining ATT that is highly efficient and easy to use. With good sensitivity and specificity values, this new tool has been proven to be very good at measuring ATT compared to CT scan as the gold standard.