No abstract

CHARM-02 is a crossover, double-blind, randomized trial to compare the safety and pharmacokinetics of three rectally applied tenofovir 1% gel candidate rectal microbicides of varying osmolalities: vaginal formulation (VF) (3111 mOsmol/kg), the reduced glycerin vaginal formulation (RGVF) (836 mOsmol/kg), and an isoosmolal rectal-specific formulation (RF) (479 mOsmol/kg). Participants (n = 9) received a single, 4 ml, radiolabeled dose of each gel twice, once with and once without simulated unprotected receptive anal intercourse (RAI). The safety, plasma tenofovir pharmacokinetics, colonic small molecule permeability, and SPECT/CT imaging of lower gastrointestinal distribution of drug and virus surrogate were assessed. There were no Grade 3 or 4 adverse events reported for any of the products. Overall, there were more Grade 2 adverse events in the VF group compared to RF (p = 0.006) and RGVF (p = 0.048). In the absence of simulated unprotected RAI, VF had up to 3.8-fold greater systemic tenofovir exposure, 26- to 234-fold higher colonic permeability of the drug surrogate, and 1.5- to 2-fold greater proximal migration in the colonic lumen, when compared to RF and RGVF. Similar trends were observed with simulated unprotected RAI, but most did not reach statistical significance. SPECT analysis showed 86% (standard deviation 19%) of the drug surrogate colocalized with the virus surrogate in the colonic lumen. There were no significant differences between the RGVF and RF formulation, with the exception of a higher plasma tenofovir concentration of RGVF in the absence of simulated unprotected RAI. VF had the most adverse events, highest plasma tenofovir concentrations, greater mucosal permeability of the drug surrogate, and most proximal colonic luminal migration compared to RF and RGVF formulations. There were no major differences between RF and RGVF formulations. Simultaneous assessment of toxicity, systemic and luminal pharmacokinetics, and colocalization of drug and viral surrogates substantially informs rectal microbicide product development.

Although nonhuman primate studies have shown that simian immunodeficiency virus/simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SIV/SHIV) exposure during preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with oral tenofovir can induce SIV immunity without productive infection, this has not been documented in humans. We evaluated cervicovaginal IgA in Partners PrEP Study participants using a subtype C primary isolate and found that women on PrEP had IgA with higher average human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-neutralizing magnitude than women on placebo (33% versus 7%; P ‫؍‬ 0.008). Using a cutoff of >90% HIV-1 neutralization, 19% of women on-PrEP had HIV-1-neutralizing IgA compared to 0% of women on placebo (P ‫؍‬ 0.09). We also estimated HIV-1 exposure and found that the proportion of women with HIV-1-neutralizing IgA was associated with the level of HIV-1 exposure (P ‫؍‬ 0.04). Taken together, our data suggest that PrEP and high levels of exposure to HIV may each enhance mucosal HIV-1-specific humoral immune responses in sexually exposed but HIV-1-uninfected individuals. IMPORTANCE Although there is not yet an effective HIV-1 vaccine, PrEP for at-risk HIV-1-uninfected individuals is a highly efficacious intervention to prevent HIV-1 acquisition and is currently being recommended by the CDC and WHO for all individuals at high risk of HIV-1 acquisition.We previously demonstrated that PrEP use does not enhance peripheral blood HIV-1-specific T-cell responses in HIV-exposed individuals. Here, we evaluate for cervicovaginal HIV-neutralizing IgA responses in genital mucosal secretions of HIV-exposed women, which is likely a more relevant site than peripheral blood for observation of potentially protective immune events occurring in response to sexual HIV-1 exposure for various periods. Furthermore, we assess for host response in the context of longitudinal quantification of HIV-1 exposure. We report that HIV-neutralizing IgA is significantly correlated with higher HIV-1 exposure and, furthermore, that there are more women with HIV-1-neutralizing IgA in the on-PrEP group than in the placebo group. T he development of novel human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) prevention strategies that reduce HIV-1 susceptibility and impart long-term immune protection is a high priority. Four randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, conducted among diverse geographic and at-risk populations, have demonstrated that HIV-1-uninfected persons taking a daily oral antiretroviral as preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP)-either tenofovir (TDF) alone or coformulated with emtricitabine (TDF/FTC)-are at substantially reduced risk of HIV-1 acquisition (1-4). In recognition of this, WHO has recently recommended PrEP use for all individuals at substantial risk of HIV-1. Since PrEP will increasingly be used as part of standard care in the context of HIV-1 vaccine studies, it is essential to better understand the potential effects of PrEP on the host immune response to HIV-1.While the primary mechanism of protection afforded by PrEP is thought to be through...