Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a form of corporate responsibility to the surrounding environment that the company must carry out to minimize environmental damage as a result of the establishment of the industry. This research wants to see the benefits of the program based on the results of community satisfaction assessment with quantitative and qualitative methods to determine the success of CSR program implementation. Public satisfaction with the implementation of the CSR program implemented by Semen Gresik Rembang Factory is directly proportional to the benefits obtained by the community. The success of the program is not only judged by the number of activities carried out, but also by the level of community satisfaction with the program and community participation in the program to support the improvement of the quality of human resources. Community capacity building is carried out through community empowerment programs to support sustainable development, which is an obligation in development in the world. The development and usefulness of activity programs need to be developed and expanded by beneficiaries to be able to solve problems that exist in the social, economic, and environmental spheres that are more effective and have a broader impact. The development and usefulness of activity programs need to be developed and expanded by beneficiaries to be able to solve problems that exist in the social, economic, and environmental spheres that are more effective and have a broader impact. The increase in community involvement also needs to be carried out not only in the process of identification, socialization, implementation, and monitoring of evaluation, but further participation until the community is able and participates in sharing more roles in the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility activities carried out by Semen Gresik Rembang Factory.

The planned housing has been phenomenally developed in some big cities in Indonesia, included Yogyakarta. The housing has been built in various models as government's policy for getting equity in diversity and for reducing housing backlog in Indonesia. The housing policy that is relevant to the problem is Balanced Housing Development. This policy has been undergone adjustments in several decades which in principle aim to alleviate the Developers in implementing this policy. The policy began with the establishment of a balance of luxury quality housing development: moderate; simple = 1: 3: 6 to 1: 2: 3. The developers still had difficulty for implementing. The fact shows that the implementation of balanced residential based housing development in Yogyakarta was still very low, which is only 1,22%. By using the data research group of "Income Generation in The Planned Housing Development" funded by High Directorate Education National Department, and some actually relevant articles, this paper discusses of what is the problem of the low achievement of the balanced ratio. Some observers of housing development and housing developers have discussed a lot of the lack of achievement on the policy. But the fundamental causes of the lack of achievement have not been studied in depth. On this basis, this paper aims to examine the causes of the low achievement and what are the solution strategies. Conclusion indicates that there are five obstacles for implementing the regulations: land prices, housing regulations, housing development authorities, community conditions, and developers as housing businesses. The solution strategies may be to evaluate the housing standards, applying progressive concepts to land ownership, determining the allocation of land for MBR in the land use regulation, and to incentives and disincentives for housing developers.

Serang city is the Capital City of Banten Province. As the time goes by, the population increases and the poor people needs an access to have a home. There are two housing environments, which is called "simple healthy housing environment" to help the poor people ,which are Banten Indah Permai and Bumi Serang Timur, but the condition is the housing environments are lack of infrastructures and facilities. This problem makes a question how the suitability of simple healthy housing environment in Kota Serang is. The suitability study of simple healthy housing environment in Serang city is done by using scoring method analysis to count the suitability of the simple healthy housing environment standards as the output and perception of the people inside the housing environment as the outcome of this simple healthy housing environment. Descriptive comparative analysis is used also to know how output and outcome can match each other in the housing environment. Final scoring result obtained that Banten Indah Permai has been classified as suit in output because of the 58 score , but Bumi Serang Timur is not suit in output because it has 55 score. In outcome scoring, Banten Indah has been classified as suit in outcome for the 76,94 score, and also for Bumi Serang Timur has 75,68 for the outcome score. With comparative analyisis, this study also obtained that there are many infrastructure and facilities in housing environment which are not give the outcome as usual the housing environment gives.