No abstract

The potential benefits of hybrid-electric propulsion (HEP) have led to an increased interest in this topic over the past decade. One promising advantage of HEP is the distribution of power along the airframe, which enables synergistic configurations with improved aerodynamic and propulsive efficiency. The purpose of this paper is to present a generic sizing method suitable for the first stages of the design process of hybrid-electric aircraft, taking into account the powertrain architecture and associated propulsion-airframe integration effects. To this end, the performance equations are modified to account for aero-propulsive interaction. A powerloading constraint-diagram is used for each component in the powertrain to provide a visual representation of the design space. The results of the power-loading diagrams are used in a HEP-compatible mission analysis and weight estimation to compute the wing area, powerplant size, and takeoff weight. The resulting method is applicable to a wide range of electric and hybrid-electric aircraft configurations and can be used to estimate the optimal power-control profiles. For demonstration purposes, the method is applied a HEP concept featuring leadingedge distributed-propulsion (DP). Three powertrain architectures are compared, showing how the aero-propulsive effects are inlcuded in the model. The results confirm the method is sensitive to top-level HEP and DP design parameters, and indicate an increase in wing loading and power loading enabled by DP.

Blended wing body (BWB) aircraft represent a paradigm shift in jet transport aircraft design that promise benefits over conventional aircraft. A method is presented to enable the conceptual design of BWB aircraft, enabling comparison studies with tube-and-wing aircraft (TAW) based on the same top-level requirements and analysis fidelity. The aim of this work is to make comparative studies between the blended-wing-body aircraft and its conventional tube-and-wing counterpart based upon the same design requirements at conceptual level. By developing a novel geometric parametrisation of the blended wing body, the design possibilities have been increased while maintaining straightforward shaping manipulation and robustness. The mass estimation methods that have been implemented are verified and validated to be within approximately 5% of reference blended wing bodies. Drag estimations perform less accurately with drag being overpredicted by approximately 20%. The cause of this over prediction was largely due to empirical corrections for miscellaneous and unaccounted drag sources as well as induced drag predicted by a vortex-lattice method. Test-case BWB and TAW aircraft were formed in the 150, 250 and 400 passenger classes. The comparisons of the resulting aircraft show that the blended wing body have reduced mass, improved aerodynamic efficiency and higher fuel economy. Trends also show that the improvements over tube-and-wing aircraft increase with aircraft size.

This paper presents the identification of the aerodynamic model of the "Flying-V", a novel aircraft configuration. The aerodynamic model is estimated using flight test data from a 4.6% sub-scale model. The dataset includes longitudinal and lateral-directional maneuvers performed by both the pilot and the autopilot to excite the aircraft dynamic modes. The so-called Two-Step Method is used to decouple and simplify the aerodynamic identification problem; the state estimation step is performed by an Iterated Extended Kalman Filter, and the parameter-estimation step using ordinary least squares. A stepwise regression technique and previous knowledge from wind-tunnel tests are combined to select the model structure, and the identified model is validated using a third of the gathered data. The estimated models are parsimonious and considered adequate in terms of model fit, with a maximum relative Root Mean Square Error of 10% for the worst validation case. For the considered location of the center of gravity and flight conditions, the estimated aerodynamic derivatives confirm that the aircraft is longitudinally stable, both statically and dynamically; and that it is also laterally and directionally statically stable. The analysis of the dynamic modes of the sub-scale model showed stable short period and roll subsidence modes, a lightly damped Dutch roll mode, and lightly damped/unstable phugoid and spiral modes.

No abstract