Aim: To determine the degree of association between visual and tactile methods of caries removal compared with caries detector dye and laser fluorescence device (DIAGNOdent), which detects the degree of demineralization; to determine the presence of Streptococcus mutans via culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques; and to find a suitable method for caries removal. Materials and Methods: A total of 75 patients were divided into three groups: visual and tactile (Group A), visual and tactile with caries detector dye (Group B), and visual and tactile with caries detector dye along with laser florescence readings (Group C). Caries removal was carried out using visual and tactile methods, caries detector dye, and laser fluorescence, and the samples obtained were subjected to culture and PCR. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey’s post hoc test. Results: Visual and tactile along with caries detector dye and laser florescence (Group C) is the most efficient method for caries removal. Conclusion: Caries detector dye along with visual, tactile examination and laser fluorescence is a valuable and superior tool for clinicians that aids in better caries removal and can prevent the overzealous removal of tooth structure.

Introduction: The smear layer removed during root canal instrumentation enables penetration of irrigant solution and adhesion of root canal sealants providing a fluid tight seal of obturated root canals, necessitating its removal. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of smear layer removal by 17% Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), 17% Ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA),10% Citric acid and (MTAD solution) a Mixture of tetracycline isomer, an acid and a detergent applied as final rinse , when used along with 2.5% (NaOCl) Sodium hypochlorite and its effect on dentin microhardness. Materials and Methods: Sixty single-rooted human mandibular premolars with minimum curvature (<5°) were instrumented using rotary instrumentation till apical enlargement size 35 RaCe file 0.04 taper. During instrumentation, the canals were irrigated with 2-mL 2.5% NaOCl. After instrumentation, teeth were rinsed with distilled water and were divided into 5 groups ( n = 12) according to final rinse for 1 min with 5-mL 17% EDTA followed by 5-mL 2.5% NaOCl (group 1, control group), 17% EGTA (group 2), MTAD solution (group 3), 10% citric acid (group 4), and 17% EDTA (group 5). Teeth were split through the groove prepared, and one-half of specimen were evaluated for smear layer removal using scanning electron microscopy. A score system was followed to evaluate the images and comparisons among groups were performed using Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis. Multiple comparisons were performed using Mann–Whitney U test. The other half was evaluated for dentin microhardness using Vickers microhardness testing machine. Microhardness values were statistically analyzed using parametric one-way analysis of variance test. Conclusion: Irrigation regimen following the use of 2.5% NaOCl during instrumentation followed by application of 5-mL 17% EDTA solution for 1 min resulted in efficient smear layer removal and less decrease in dentin microhardness compared with 17% EGTA, 10% citric acid, and MTAD solution.