In our experimental model, prophylactic treatment with the NO donor molsidomine regulates the systemic inflammatory response and minimizes damage at the kidney level. Clinical Relevance The importance of this article resides in the fact that an experimental study that clarifies the effect of the donors of NO under circumstances as similar as possible to those of the human clinic, such as aortic surgery under hypovolemic shock (ruptured aortic aneurysm) have been little studied, most of these studies being performed in rodents without bypass. Using a model with one or two simultaneous insults (aortic clamping with/without previous hemorrhage) that is very similar to the human clinical situation (abdominal aortic rupture), we confirm the findings of previous work related to the beneficial effects of NO donors.

Surgery of the abdominal aorta generates a systemic inflammatory response (SIR), a source of operative morbidity-mortality. In the present work we attempted to evaluate the evolution of SIR in an experimental model that simulates elective and urgent surgery on the abdominal aorta. Fifteen mini-pigs divided into three groups were used. The animals were subjected to suprarenal aortic/iliac clamping and bypass with a Dacron-collagen prosthetic graft. Groups were as follows: (1) sham (only aortic dissection); (2) clamping and bypass; (3) hemorrhage of 40%, pre-clamping, and bypass. Determinations included (1) tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, interferon-gamma; (2) myeloperoxidase (MPO), superoxide anion (SOA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and malondialdehyde (MDA); (3) nitrites; (4) iNOS, (5) cell adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-1) at 24 hours, 48 hours, and on day 7; and (6) NFkappaB at 48 hours. Our results point to an increase in all inflammatory variables, corroborated by their molecular regulators such as the expression of CAMs, iNOS, and NFkappaB. The alterations tended to normalize by day 7, after reperfusion. The results point to the great importance of SIR at all levels (molecular, nuclear, cellular, and systemic) in situations such as elective and urgent abdominal aorta surgery and the role that control of this response could represent for the future of vascular surgery.

No abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Many clinical investigations use generic and/or specific questionnaires to obtain information about participants and patients. There is disagreement about whether the administration method can affect the results. The aim here was to determine whether, among patients with intermittent claudication (IC), there are differences in the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) and European Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) scores with regard to: 1) the questionnaire administration method (self-administration versus face-to-face interview); and 2) the type of interviewer (vascular surgeon, VS, versus general practitioner, GP). DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional observational multicenter epidemiological study carried out within the Spanish National Health Service. METHODS: 1,641 evaluable patients with IC firstly completed the WIQ and EQ-5D questionnaires and then were interviewed by their doctor on the same day. Pearson correlations and Chi-square tests were used. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation (r > 0.800; P < 0.001) between the two methods of administering the WIQ and EQ-5D questionnaires, and between the VS and GP groups. Likewise, there was a high level of concordance (P > 0.05) between the different dimensions of the WIQ-distance and EQ-5D (selfadministration versus face-to-face) in the VS and GP groups. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between the different methods of administering the WIQ and EQ-5D questionnaires, among the patients with IC. Similarly, the two types of interviewers (VS or GP) were equally valid. Therefore, it seems unnecessary to expend effort to administer these questionnaires by interview, in studies on IC. RESULTADOS: Houve forte correlação (r > 0,800; P < 0,001) entre os dois métodos de administração do WIQ e EQ-5D; e entre os grupos CV e MG. Também houve alto nível de concordância (P > 0,05) entre as diferentes dimensões do WIQ-distância e EQ-5D (autoadministrado versus entrevista presencial), nos grupos CV e MG. CONCLUSÃO: Em pacientes com CI, não há diferenças entre as diferentes formas de administrar os questionários WIQ e EQ-5D. Da mesma forma, os dois tipos de entrevistador (CV ou MG) foram igualmente válidos. Portanto, não parece necessário despender esforço para administrar esses questionários através de entrevista, em estudos de CI. RESUMO

The exogenous administration of NO before the two sequential insults prevented BT and controlled SIRS peripherally and at both cellular and transcriptional level in a lasting manner. In contrast, antibiotic treatment only exerted its action at peripheral level. The association of both treatments did not provide any important advantages.