BackgroundLung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths in men and the second most frequent cause of cancer deaths in women in Estonia. The study aimed to analyze time trends in LC incidence and mortality in Estonia over the 30-year period, which included major social, economic and health care transition. The results are discussed in the context of changes in tobacco control and smoking prevalence. Long-term predictions of incidence and mortality are provided.MethodsData for calculating the incidence and mortality rates in 1985–2014 were obtained from the nationwide population-based Estonian Cancer Registry and the Causes of Death Registry. Joinpoint regression was used to analyze trends and estimate annual percentage change (APC) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Nordpred model was used to project future incidence and mortality trends for 2015–2034.ResultsIncidence peaked among men in 1991 and decreased thereafter (APC: -1.5, 95% CI: -1.8; −1.3). A decline was seen for all age groups, except age ≥ 75 years, and for all histological types, except adenocarcinoma and large cell carcinoma. Incidence among women increased overall (APC: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1; 2.0) and in all age groups and histological types, except small cell carcinoma. Age-standardized incidence rate (world) per 100,000 was 54.2 in men and 12.9 in women in 2014. Changes in mortality closely followed those in incidence. According to our predictions, the age-standardized incidence and mortality rates will continue to decrease in men and reach a plateau in women.ConclusionsThe study revealed divergent LC trends by gender, age and histological type, which were generally consistent with main international findings. Growing public awareness and stricter tobacco control have stimulated overall favorable changes in men, but not yet in women. Large increase in incidence was observed for adenocarcinoma, which in men showed a trend opposite to the overall decline. LC will remain a serious public health issue in Estonia due to a high number of cases during the next decades, related to aging population, and previous and current smoking patterns. National tobacco control policy in Estonia should prioritize preventing smoking initiation and promoting smoking cessation, particularly among women.

Background: The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence the delivery of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in Switzerland, and to analyze the adherence to consensus guidelines. Methods: Based on 7 regional cancer registries covering 45% of the Swiss population, we identified 1408 women which underwent mastectomy for stage I-III breast cancer between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2005. We categorized patients according to ASCO grouping in similar fashion to other comparable studies: low-risk group (T1/T2 N0): PMRT not routinely recommended; intermediate-risk group (T1/T2 N1): PMRT controversial; high risk group (T3-T4 and/or N2-N3): PMRT recommended. We further investigated factors leading to potential overtreatment (PMRT in low-risk group) or undertreatment (absence of PMRT in high-risk group). Data analysis was performed for the entire cohort, and separately for patients <70 years and ≥ 70 years of age. Probability of receiving PMRT was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 421 patients (29.9%) received adjuvant RT after mastectomy. The rate of PMRT delivery was 67% in the high-risk group, compared to 6% and 18% in the low-risk and intermediate-risk groups, respectively. For patients at high-risk of chest wall recurrence after mastectomy (T3-T4 or N2-N3 disease), the risk of PMRT omission wassignificantly associated to older age (OR 4.25 [95% CI: 2.27-7.95] for patients ≥ 70 years) and to the absence of chemotherapy (OR 4.30 [95% CI: 1.97-9.36]). In patients with T3-T4 disease, PMRT was delivered in 77% of patients < 70 years and in 42% of patients ≥ 70 years (p<0.001). In patients with N2-N3 disease, PMRT was delivered in 82% of patients < 70 years and in 51% of patients ≥70 years (p<0.001). PMRT was delivered to 28 patients (7%) at low-risk of recurrence after mastectomy (T1-T2 N0, negative margins). It was more frequently offered to patients <40 years of age (OR 3.86 [95% CI: 1.01-14.76]), with T2 tumors (OR 3.43 [95% CI: 1.45-8.11]) and negative hormone receptor status (OR 2.60 [95% CI: 1.04-6.50]). Positive or close surgical margins (< 1mm) were a strong indicator for PMRT (p=0.001) and chest wall boost (p<0.03). Conclusions: After mastectomy, one third of patients (33.26%) with high-risk disease did not receive PMRT. Even if we consider only patients < 70 years, a non-trivial proportion of patients with clear indication for treatment delivery did not receive PMRT (T3-T4 disease: 23%; N2-N3 disease: 18%). Further analyses are planned to explain the apparent failure of evidence-based guidelines to impact the adoption of PMRT in women with high-risk breast cancer. Citation Format: Zwahlen DR, Ess S, Zimmermann M, Bordoni A, Bouchardy C, Frick H, Konzelmann I, Mousavi M, Rohrmann S, Oehler C. Disparities in the application of post-mastectomy radiotherapy in Switzerland: A pooled analysis of 7 cancer registries over the 2003-2005 period [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-24.

No abstract