The Jamar dynamometer and Vigorimeter have been used to assess grip strength in immune-mediated neuropathies, but have never been compared to each other. Therefore, we performed a comparison study between these two devices in patients with immune-mediated neuropathies. Grip strength data were collected in 102 cross-sectional stable and 163 longitudinal (new diagnoses or changing condition) patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), gammopathy-related polyneuropathy (MGUSP), and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). Stable patients were assessed twice (validity/reliability studies). Longitudinal patients were assessed 3-5 times during 1 year. Responsiveness comparison between the two tools was examined using combined anchor-/distribution-based minimum clinically important difference (MCID) techniques. Patients were asked to indicate their preference for the Jamar or Vigorimeter. Both tools correlated highly with each other (ρ = 0.86, p < 0.0001) and showed good intra-class correlation coefficients (Jamar [Right/Left hands]: ICC 0.997/0.96; Vigori: ICC 0.95/0.98). Meaningful changes were comparable between the two instruments, being higher in GBS compared to CIDP patients. In MGUSP/MMN poor responsiveness was seen. Significant more patients preferred the Vigorimeter. In conclusion, validity, reliability, and responsiveness aspects were comparable between the Jamar dynamometer and Vigorimeter. However, based on patients' preference, the Vigorimeter is recommended in future studies in immune-mediated neuropathies.

Familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) is a chronic debilitating multi-organic disorder, mainly assessed using ordinal-based impairment measures. To date, no outcome measure at the activity and participation level has been constructed in FAP. The current study aimed to design an interval activity/participation scale for FAP through Rasch methodology. A preliminary FAP Rasch-built overall disability scale (pre-FAP-RODS) containing 146 activity/participation items was assessed twice (interval: 2-4 week; test-retest reliability) in 248 patients with Val30Met FAP examined in Porto, Portugal, of which 65.7% have received liver transplantation. An ordinal-based 24-item FAP-symptoms inventory questionnaire (FAP-SIQ) was also assessed (validity purposes). The pre-FAP-RODS and FAP-SIQ data were subjected to Rasch analyses. The pre-FAP-RODS did not meet model's expectations. On the basis of requirements such as misfit statistics, differential item functioning, and local dependency, items were systematically removed until a final 34-item FAP-RODS(©) was constructed fulfilling all Rasch requirements. Acceptable reliability/validity scores were demonstrated. In conclusion, the 34-item FAP-RODS(©) is a disease-specific interval measure suitable for detecting activity and participation restrictions in patients with FAP. The use of the FAP-RODS(©) is recommended for future international clinical trials in patients with Val30Met FAP determining its responsiveness and its cross-cultural validation. Its expansion to other forms of FAP should also be focus of future clinical studies.

Since there is no international consensus on how to assess and treat patients with MGUSP, the current study addresses new advances in the field of modern clinimetrics and recommendations for future outcome measure studies in MGUSP before proceeding with new interventional trials.

Inflammatory Rasch‐built overall disability scale (I‐RODS) seems to be a valid activity measure for use in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Our aim was to translate and validate the I‐RODS for use in CIDP patients from Serbia. Study comprised 83 patients diagnosed with CIDP. I‐RODS was translated and cross‐culturally validated using the standard guidelines. Following scales were also administered: Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score, Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) sensory and disability scores, Krupp's Fatigue Severity Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Visual Analogue Scale for pain, and health survey‐36 (SF‐36) as a quality of life measure. According to the I‐RODS, significant proportion of our patients reported that “running” (51%), “dancing” (41%), and “standing for hours” (40%) were impossible tasks to perform, while “teeth brushing” (94%), “eating” (88%), and “reading a newspaper/book” (82%) were noted as the easiest items. Patients with more muscle weakness (lower MRC sum score) and more severe INCAT sensory score had lower I‐RODS score (P < .01). Also, patients with fatigue, depression and pain had lower I‐RODS scores (P < .01). I‐RODS score correlated with the INCAT disability score (P < 0.01) was 78 ± 19 compared to 51 ± 30 in patients with INCAT >1 (P < .01). I‐RODS score correlated with the total SF‐36 score (rho = +0.73, P < .01), as well as with all SF‐36 domain scores. Serbian version of the I‐RODS seems to be a valid activity measure for use in CIDP patients. I‐RODS was able to assess different levels of disability, it was in association with impairment measures, INCAT disability scale and quality of life. Further studies are needed to assess its responsiveness.