Treatment with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device in patients with advanced heart failure significantly improved the probability of survival free from stroke and device failure at 2 years as compared with a pulsatile device. Both devices significantly improved the quality of life and functional capacity. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00121485.)

Summary Background C-kit+ lineage− cardiac stem cells (CSCs) improve postinfarction left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in animals; however, their efficacy in humans is unknown. Methods In February 2009, we began SCIPIO (Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic CardiOmyopathy), a Phase I, randomized, open-label trial of CSCs in patients with postinfarction LV dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] ≤ 40%) who underwent coronary bypass surgery. Autologous CSCs were isolated from the right atrial appendage and re-infused intracoronarily 4 ± 1 months after surgery; controls received no treatment. In Stage A, 9 treated and 4 control patients were consecutively enrolled to assess the feasibility and short-term safety of CSCs. Then, in Stage B, patients were randomized to the treated or control arm in a 2:3 ratio using a block randomization scheme and a block size of five. Primary (safety) and secondary (efficacy) endpoints were assessed at serial times after enrollment. Findings Autologous CSCs were successfully isolated and expanded in 80 out of 81 patients. In 16 treated patients, no CSC-related adverse effects have been observed. LVEF (3D echocardiography) increased from 30.3 ± 1.9% before CSC infusion to 38.5 ± 2.8% at 4 months after infusion, (P=0.001, n=14). This was associated with an improvement in regional wall motion score index (echocardiography) (1.91 ± 0.09 vs. 1.73 ± 0.09, P=0.005), NYHA functional class (2.19 ± 0.16 vs. 1.63 ± 0.16, P=0.003), and quality of life (MLHFQ score, 46.44 ± 5.22 vs. 26.69 ± 4.92, P<0.0001). In contrast, in 7 control patients, none of these variables changed appreciably during the corresponding time-interval. Importantly, the salubrious effects of CSCs were even more pronounced at 1 year (e.g., LVEF increased by 12.3 ± 2.1% vs. pre-CSCs, P=0.0007, n=8), suggesting that CSCs continue to improve LV function beyond the first 4 months. In the 7 treated patients in whom cardiac magnetic resonance (cMR) imaging could be performed, infarct size decreased by 7.8 ± 1.7 g (23.8%) at 4 months (P=0.004) and 9.8 ± 3.5 g (30.3%) at 1 year (P=0.04). Interpretation These initial results in humans are very encouraging, and suggest that infusion of autologous CSCs is effective in improving LV systolic function and reducing infarct size in patients with heart failure.

No abstract

In this trial involving patients with advanced heart failure who were ineligible for heart transplantation, a small, intrapericardial, centrifugal-flow LVAD was found to be noninferior to an axial-flow LVAD with respect to survival free from disabling stroke or device removal for malfunction or failure. (Funded by HeartWare; ENDURANCE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01166347 .).

Background-The landmark Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive HeartFailure (REMATCH) trial first demonstrated that implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as destination therapy (DT) can provide survival superior to any known medical treatment in patients with end-stage heart failure who are ineligible for transplantation. In the present study, we describe outcomes of DT in the post-REMATCH era in the United States. Methods and Results-The present study included 280 patients who underwent HeartMate XVE LVAD implantation between November 2001 and December 2005. A preoperative risk score for in-hospital mortality after LVAD implantation was established in 222 patients with complete data. All patients were followed up until death or December 2006. The 1-year survival after LVAD implantation was 56%. The in-hospital mortality after LVAD surgery was 27%.The main causes of death included sepsis, right heart failure, and multiorgan failure. The most important determinants of in-hospital mortality were poor nutrition, hematological abnormalities, markers of end-organ or right ventricular dysfunction, and lack of inotropic support. Stratification of DT candidates into low (nϭ65), medium (nϭ111), high (nϭ28), and very high (nϭ18) risk on the basis of the risk score calculated from these predictors corresponded with 1-year survival rates of 81%, 62%, 28%, and 11%, respectively. Conclusions-Appropriate