The discovery of therapeutic peptides is often accelerated by means of virtual screening supported by machine learning-based predictive models. The predictive performance of such models is sensitive to the choice of data and its representation scheme. While the peptide physicochemical and compositional representations fail to distinguish sequence permutations, the amino acid arrangement within the sequence lacks the important information contained in physicochemical, conformational, topological, and geometrical properties. In this paper, we propose a solution to the identified information gap by implementing a hybrid scheme that complements the best traits from both approaches with the aim of predicting antimicrobial and antiviral activities based on experimental data from DRAMP 2.0, AVPdb, and Uniprot data repositories. Using the Friedman test of statistical significance, we compared our hybrid, sequential properties approach to peptide properties, one-hot vector encoding, and word embedding schemes in the 10-fold cross-validation setting, with respect to the F1 score, Matthews correlation coefficient, geometric mean, recall, and precision evaluation metrics. Moreover, the sequence modeling neural network was employed to gain insight into the synergic effect of both properties-and amino acid order-based predictions. The results suggest that sequential properties significantly (P < 0.01) surpasses the aforementioned state-of-the-art representation schemes. This makes it a strong candidate for increasing the predictive power of screening methods based on machine learning, applicable to any category of peptides.

No abstract

&lt;p&gt;In this study, we compared the performance of machine learning models trained using transfer learning and those that were trained from scratch - on time series data. Four machine learning models were used for the experiment. Two models were taken from the field of seismology, and the other two are general-purpose models for working with time series data. The accuracy of selected models was systematically observed and analyzed when switching within the same domain of application (seismology), as well as between mutually different domains of application (seismology, speech, medicine, finance). In seismology, we used two databases of local earthquakes (one in counts, and the other with the instrument response removed) and a database of global earthquakes for predicting earthquake magnitude; other datasets targeted classifying spoken words (speech), predicting stock prices (finance) and classifying muscle movement from EMG signals (medicine).&lt;br&gt;In practice, it is very demanding and sometimes impossible to collect datasets of tagged data large enough to successfully train a machine learning model. Therefore, in our experiment, we use reduced data sets of 1,500 and 9,000 data instances to mimic such conditions. Using the same scaled-down datasets, we trained two sets of machine learning models: those that used transfer learning for training and those that were trained from scratch. We compared the performances between pairs of models in order to draw conclusions about the utility of transfer learning. In order to confirm the validity of the obtained results, we repeated the experiments several times and applied statistical tests to confirm the significance of the results. The study shows when, within the set experimental framework, the transfer of knowledge brought improvements in terms of model accuracy and in terms of model convergence rate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our results show that it is possible to achieve better performance and faster convergence by transferring knowledge from the domain of global earthquakes to the domain of local earthquakes; sometimes also vice versa. However, improvements in seismology can sometimes also be achieved by transferring knowledge from medical and audio domains. The results show that the transfer of knowledge between other domains brought even more significant improvements, compared to those within the field of seismology. For example, it has been shown that models in the field of sound recognition have achieved much better performance compared to classical models and that the domain of sound recognition is very compatible with knowledge from other domains. We came to similar conclusions for the domains of medicine and finance. Ultimately, the paper offers suggestions when transfer learning is useful, and the explanations offered can provide a good starting point for knowledge transfer using time series data.&lt;/p&gt;

No abstract

No abstract