Standard technical solutions are not cost-effective for many small hydropower sites. This study aims to demonstrate the workflow for the tailor-made variable-speed axial propeller turbine and provide proof of this concept. The turbine is designed to meet the site’s specific space limitations and operating range needs. The runner shape is adjusted to the variable-speed operation and defined hydraulic profile using a parametric geometry model and CFD-based optimization. The variable-speed propeller turbine shows excellent flow control while keeping the mechanical design simple. The tailor-made approach minimizes construction costs using existing structures and is highly suitable for mini-hydropower applications. The prototype—an atypical turbine designed for highly restricted space and installed on-site—serves as proof of the concept. The findings on the design of axial variable-speed turbines are presented.

Suitable and accurate flow measurement in pumped storage hydropower plants (PSP) is a challenging task due to the entirely different hydraulic behaviour of the penstock. This study presents a novel approach to choosing a suitable flow measurement method and position. The focus is on the flow measurement in a specific short penstock of the largest peak-load hydropower plant, Orlík, after its transformation to a PSP. Our approach is based on three main pillars: numerical modelling of fluid flow (ANSYS CFX), standards, and scientific literature. First, the steady-state numerical model output for the current state is compared to historical measurements of point velocities using current meters and measured hydraulic losses in the penstock. Subsequently, for the planned conversion to the reversible Francis turbine, including shape modifications of the flow paths, a steady numerical simulation of the flow in the penstock was performed in both turbine and pump modes. By analysing the resulting pressure and velocity fields and comparing them to standards and scientific literature, the values of the uncertainty in the flow measurement were calculated. The outcome is a straightforward evaluation and comparison of three main flow measurement methods: current meter, pressure–time, and ultrasonic transit time.