We examined the effects of various KCl concentrations on the actions of some vasodilators belonging to different pharmacological classes in rat aortic rings. In some experiments, tissues were precontracted with noradrenaline after blocking voltage-dependent channels to assess the effects of depolarisation unaccompanied by the entry of extracellular Ca2+ into the cytosol. Concentration/response curves for the vasorelaxant effect of calcium entry blockers (e.g. diltiazem), K+ channel openers (e.g. aprikalim), nitrate derivatives (e.g. nitroglycerin), a beta2-adrenergic agonist (salbutamol) and papaverine were obtained by using endothelium-denuded rat aortic rings precontracted with KC1 (20-60 mM) to determine the potencies and efficacies of the drugs. The efficacies and potencies of calcium entry inhibitors were virtually independent of the [KCl]. A reduction in the potency (up to 18-fold) of papaverine occurred without changes in efficacy when the [KCl] was raised from 20 to 60 mM. The decline in potency was even greater for nitrate-like compounds. The potency of K+ channel openers in aortic rings precontracted with 30 mM KCI decreased by three- to sixfold compared with those precontracted with 20 mM KCl. With the exception of pinacidil, the efficacy of these agents already started to decline in preparations precontracted with 25 mM KCI and was virtually zero in preparations precontracted with 60 mM KCI. In contrast to other K+ channel openers, the vasorelaxant action of pinacidil was relatively resistant to glibenclamide. Salbutamol produced only a slight relaxation even in preparations precontracted with 20 mM KCl. In nitrendipine-pretreated, noradrenaline-precontracted aortic rings, the vasorelaxant effects of aprikalim, but not those of linsidomine or papaverine, declined when the [KCl] of the bathing medium was increased. In conclusion, the vasorelaxant potency and efficacy of calcium entry blockers is independent of the [KCI] used to precontract rat aortic rings, and thus, of the degree of membrane depolarisation. In contrast, increasing the [KCl] strongly reduces the potency and the efficacy of K+ channel openers not only in this preparation but also in noradrenaline-precontracted rings in which the entry of extracellular Ca2+ was prevented with nitrendipine. This indicates that, with the exception of pinacidil, the vasorelaxant activity of K+ channel openers depends on the degree of membrane depolarisation. Finally, the vasorelaxant potency and efficacy of nitrate-like compounds and papaverine are independent of depolarisation per se but they are markedly affected by the influx of Ca2+ accompanying elevated [KCI]. Thus, the degree of vessel depolarisation should be taken into consideration when attempting to compare potencies and efficacies among vasorelaxant agents.

Earlier experiments only revealed involvement of sympathetic pre-synaptic dopaminergic receptors in dopamine induced inotropism in myocardium. We therefore used electrically stimulated (1 Hz) isolated 7-day-old chick embryo heart ventricles, thought to be devoid of functional sympathetic nerves, to re-investigate post-synaptic receptors involvement and particularly that of dopaminergic receptors in the positive inotropic effect of dopamine. The results showed that noradrenaline, isoprenaline and dopamine produced a positive inotropic effect with a similar efficacy and with an order of potency as follows: Isoprenaline = Noradrenaline > Dopamine. Tyramine induced no significant modification of the "initial tension" indicating that functional sympathetic innervation and/or releasable endogenous catecholamines were not demonstrable in the 7-day-old chick embryo heart ventricle. Propranolol (1 microM) competitively antagonized the positive inotropic response to isoprenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine, meanwhile phentolamine (3 microM) failed to significantly modify the effects of both noradrenaline and dopamine, indicating that these catecholamines induced their positive inotropic effects via stimulation of beta-adrenoceptors; involvement of alpha-adrenergic receptors stimulation was not demonstrable in these effects. Moreover, haloperidol (2 microM) antagonized the positive inotropic response to dopamine but had not any significant effect on the response to isoprenaline. The combined application of both propranolol and haloperidol antagonized the positive inotropic response to dopamine to a greater extent than when these two antagonists were given alone. Consequently, post-synaptic dopaminergic receptors were also involved in the positive inotropic effect of dopamine. Furthermore, in preparations in which sodium channels were inactivated by high potassium physiological salt solution, high concentrations of dopamine (0.1 mM to 1 mM) induced a slow developing electrical and positive inotropic responses which were also inhibited by propranolol and haloperidol, but not by phentolamine. These latter results indicated that like beta-adrenergic stimulation, the slow inward calcium current activated by stimulation of adenylate cyclase, was at least in part involved in the positive inotropic response to dopamine. In conclusion, dopamine induced its positive inotropism via stimulation of post-synaptic beta-adrenergic and dopaminergic receptors. The contribution of dopaminergic receptors in this positive inotropic effect might be of the DA-2 receptors since haloperidol used had been reported to be more DA-2 than DA-1 antagonist. These DA-2 receptors subtypes would mediate activation of adenylate cyclase.

No abstract