A new generation of implantation instruments were developed for quadriceps sparing surgical approaches during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is little information on the accuracy of the bone cuts performed with the side-cutting technique. A total of 100 patients were randomized to undergo computer-assisted TKA or non-navigated TKA using a mini-subvastus surgical approach and side-cutting implant instrumentation. The radiographic parameters, clinical outcomes and knee scores were evaluated 3 months postoperative. The mechanical axis of the limb was within 3 degrees varus/valgus in 76% of the patients who had navigated procedures versus 66% of patients who had conventional surgery. The tibial slope showed a rate of inaccuracy of 3 degrees or less for 78% of the patients in the navigated total knee arthroplasty group versus 66% of the patients in the conventional group. Clinical outcomes and knee scores were similar in both groups. The navigation technique could not compensate for shortcomings of the implantation instruments.

Several choices of instrument systems are available for minimally invasive surgical approaches. There are reports that one alternative, the quadriceps sparing, side-cutting instrumentation, results in diminished implantation accuracy. A total of 108 patients were randomized to undergo TKA either using side-cutting implant instrumentation (Group A) or anterior-posterior mini-incision instrumentation (Group B). All TKAs were operated on with a minimal invasive, mini-midvastus surgical approach. 50% of the TKAs were performed with computer-assistance in each cohort. The radiographic parameters, clinical outcomes and knee scores were evaluated preoperatively and 3 months postoperative. In Group B, we found significantly higher accuracy for the mechanical axis of the limb (range +/-3 degrees: Group A 54% versus Group B 89%, p = <0.001), medial proximal tibial angle (range +/-3 degrees: Group A 85% versus Group B 98%, p = <0.027) and tibial slope (range +/-3 degrees: Group A 59% versus Group B 85%, p = <0.007). The application of the navigation system could only significantly reduce outliers (accuracy >3 degrees) in Group B. Clinical outcomes and knee scores were similar in both groups and were not influenced by computer-assistance. Using the anterior-posterior, mini-incision instruments for minimally invasive TKA will lead to higher implantation accuracy when compared to the quadriceps sparing side-cutting instrumentation. The navigation technique could not compensate for shortcomings of the side-cutting instrumentation. The clinical relevance of this study is that the quadriceps sparing side-cutting instrumentation should not be used for TKA because of unacceptable reduced implantation accuracy.