The term "milieu therapy" (MT) is commonly used in mental health literatures. However, because MT has historically encompassed a wide range of practices, it has invited the criticism that it is simply an attractive theoretical packaging of the time clients spend between other specified interventions, such as individual and group therapies. Some have suggested that, because of its conceptual ambiguity, MT should be abandoned altogether. Despite these challenges, MT endures as a common approach to social work practice in a range of clinical settings. This article describes a study that used ethnography to investigate the perspectives of workers from two mental health organizations that claim to provide MT. By analyzing four themes common to both sites, this article brings exploratory empirical findings to bear on the question of what constitutes MT in contemporary mental health organizations. Participants reported that (a) everything in the physical and social milieu has the potential to affect therapeutic change; (b) the milieu itself functions as a therapeutic agent; (c) the milieu provides a context for modeling and practicing desired behaviors; and (d) MT is a principlebased ethos, rather than a set of specific interventions. Implications of these findings for social work research, practice, and funding are discussed.
This article is part of a larger ethnographic study that seeks to understand how community mental health practice has changed over time in response to shifts in Medicaid management and financing. In this article, I examine the struggle that took place on the ground in one emblematic community mental health agency as frontline workers strived to realize their 'recovery' vision under emerging managerial arrangements of fee-forservice billing. This study finds that managerial reforms conflict with locally forged practices that emphasize self-determination and program responsiveness. By analyzing how street-level workers respond to formal policy in a real-time, situated context, this article gives greater transparency to policies that are otherwise uncertain, providing a fuller picture of how policy is produced in everyday life.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.