No abstract

No abstract

Hymenoptera venom allergy is an epidemiologically underestimated condition representing an important cause of morbidity worldwide. Preventing future allergic reactions in patients who have developed a systemic reaction is based on the correct management of emergency followed by a correct diagnosis, prescription of adrenaline autoinjectors and, where indicated, specific venom immunotherapy (VIT). Some epidemiological studies highlight the poor knowledge of this disease and the frequent inadequacy of its management. Moreover, they emphasize the importance of such a life-saving treatment as specific immunotherapy. The availability of high quality Hymenoptera venom extracts for diagnostic and therapeutic use has dramatically improved the prognosis and the quality of life of allergic patients. The subcutaneous VIT represents the most effective form of immunotherapy with allergen presently available, with a carry-over effect lasting up to several years after its interruption. This report on the management of children and adults allergic to Hymenoptera venom was drawn up by a panel of Italian experts. The main objective of this consensus is to review the scientific evidences related to diagnosis, therapy and management of patients allergic to Hymenoptera venom and is aimed to improve the knowledge about this disease and promote good clinical practices. Practical suggestions for a correct diagnosis, prescription of emergency therapy and immunotherapy, as well as strategies for taking care of patients´ management are included.

No abstract

BackgroundTreatment failure during venom immunotherapy (VIT) may be associated with a variety of risk factors.ObjectiveOur aim was to evaluate the association of baseline serum tryptase concentration (BTC) and of other parameters with the frequency of VIT failure during the maintenance phase.MethodsIn this observational prospective multicenter study, we followed 357 patients with established honey bee or vespid venom allergy after the maintenance dose of VIT had been reached. In all patients, VIT effectiveness was either verified by sting challenge (n = 154) or patient self-reporting of the outcome of a field sting (n = 203). Data were collected on BTC, age, gender, preventive use of anti-allergic drugs (oral antihistamines and/or corticosteroids) right after a field sting, venom dose, antihypertensive medication, type of venom, side effects during VIT, severity of index sting reaction preceding VIT, and duration of VIT. Relative rates were calculated with generalized additive models.Results22 patients (6.2%) developed generalized symptoms during sting challenge or after a field sting. A strong association between the frequency of VIT failure and BTC could be excluded. Due to wide confidence bands, however, weaker effects (odds ratios <3) of BTC were still possible, and were also suggested by a selective analysis of patients who had a sting challenge. The most important factor associated with VIT failure was a honey bee venom allergy. Preventive use of anti-allergic drugs may be associated with a higher protection rate.InterpretationIt is unlikely that an elevated BTC has a strong negative effect on the rate of treatment failures. The magnitude of the latter, however, may depend on the method of effectiveness assessment. Failure rate is higher in patients suffering from bee venom allergy.