Background: Prior research in 2005 and 2008 estimated planted forest investment returns for a set of countries and included some natural forest species in a few countries. This research has extended those analyses to a larger set of countries and focused on plantation species, for seven years. This research serves as a "benchmarking" exercise that helps identify comparative advantages among countries for timber investment returns, as well as other institutional, forestry, and policy factors that affect investments. Furthermore, it extends the analyses to examine the effects of land prices, environmental regulations, and increased productivity on timber investment returns, as well as comparing timber returns with traditional stock market returns.
ResumoRendimento em madeira serrada de Pinus taeda para duas metodologias de desdobro. Este trabalho teve o objetivo de avaliar o rendimento em madeira serrada de Pinus taeda com duas diferentes metodologias de desdobro, denominadas de sistema convencional e sistema otimizado, utilizando 100 toras com diâmetros entre 18 e 44 cm. As 100 toras foram agrupadas em cinco classes diamétricas com 20 toras, sendo essas divididas em igual número para cada sistema de desdobro No desdobro convencional, o rendimento variou de 35,24% a 43,92%, e no desdobro otimizado, de 41,65% a 63,04%. O rendimento foi afetado pelo sistema de desdobro utilizado. No desdobro convencional, não houve tendência de aumento do rendimento com o aumento do diâmetro das toras. No desdobro otimizado o rendimento foi maior em todas as classes e apresentou a tendência de aumentar com o aumento do diâmetro das toras. A classificação de toras e modelos de corte para cada classe diamétrica (desdobro otimizado) foi uma forma eficiente para aumentar o rendimento em madeira serrada de pinus. Palavras-chave: Pinus; classificação de toras; modelos de corte; otimização. AbstractSawnwoodyield of Pinus taeda for two log sawing methodologies. This work was developed to evaluate the sawnwoodyield of Pinus taeda with two differents methodologies of log sawing called conventional and optimized systems, for a hundred logs with diameters between 18 and 44 cm. The logs were grouped in five diameter classes with twenty logs by class. The half of them were divided in the same number for each sawing system. In the conventional sawing the yield ranged from 35,24% to 43,92%, while in optimized sawing the variation was from 41,65% to 63,04%. The yield was affected by the sawing system used. In conventional sawing, do not have on increase tendency of yield with the logs' diameter raise. In optimized sawing system the yield was greater in all classes and showed the tendency of increasing with logs' diameter raise. The logs' selection and sawing models used to each diameter class (optimized sawing) were efficient methods to increase the yield in sawnwood of pine. Keywords: Pine; logs classification; sawn models; optimization. INTRODUÇÃOAo longo das últimas décadas, o perfil de consumo de madeiras oriundas de reflorestamento mudou substancialmente em função das restrições de exploração e da disponibilidade de espécies florestais nativas. A cadeia produtiva estendeu-se para as essências de rápido crescimento, plantadas e manejadas. A grande concentração de plantios de pinus é a região Sul do Brasil, especificamente os estados do Paraná e Santa Catarina, onde as espécies mais plantadas são Pinus elliottii e Pinus taeda.A madeira de pinus exerce importante papel no fornecimento de matéria-prima para indústrias de papel e papelão, laminados, compensados e indústria moveleira. Devido ao elevado consumo que tem ocorrido na região Sul do Brasil nos últimos anos, a procura pela matéria-prima pinus aumentou, conseqüentemente diminuindo sua oferta no mercado. Dessa forma, surgiu a necessi...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.