Embora exista significativa aceitação da estrutura tripla por estudos da inteligência artificial, a literatura atual converge para um processamento duplo. Dessa forma, necessita-se ainda de discussões acerca dos componentes da mente. Sendo assim, o presente trabalho propõe validar uma escala para mensuração dos Sistemas Cognitivos, aprofundando o entendimento sobre suas divisões. Para isso, baseou-se na Rational Experimental Inventory (REI) para mensurar as diferenças individuais nos estilos de pensar, com um total de 2.843 observações. Como resultados, a escala pôde, então, ser validada com 3 fatores de significativa confiabilidade. Percebeu-se que, embora a intuição tenha se agrupado em um fator único, a racionalidade se dividiu em dois fatores. A amostra parece perceber a racionalidade como procedente de dois diferentes mecanismos: um lógico, e um mais profundo e exigente. A REI foi reconhecida estatisticamente encontrando-se 3 fatores, dois relativos à racionalidade e um à intuição, havendo um relacionamento entre as duas racionalidades. PALAVRAS-CHAVEValidação de escalas. Sistemas cognitivos. Sistema intuitivo. Sistema racional. Análise fatorial.
The present study proposed to present contributions regarding the bias of Optimism, with the objective of analyzing and validating a scale for Optimism in the Brazilian population. For this purpose, we used the TOV-R scale, it is also used in other countries. Although it was already translated in Brazil, it did not have its Construct Validity tested at the time. In relation to the sample, it consisted of 2,843 individuals. The statistical treatment of the data was done by means of Exploratory Factorial Analyzes (AFE), in which Cronbach’s alpha (α) was tested, with a result of 0.654 for the Optimism factor and 0.609 a for Pessimism, indicating reliability. Afterwards, a Confirmatory Factorial Analysis (AFC) was carried out, in which the negative correlation between the factors Optimism and Pessimism was perceived, something already expected due to the antagonism between the factors. However, it was not possible to validate Constructo because there is no Convergent and Discriminant Validation for the Optimism and Pessimism factors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.