Abstract. This article is a crit ique on the paper 'Spatial characterization of long-term hydrological change in the Arkavathy watershed adjacent to Bangalore, India', by Penny et al. (2018), published in the journal of Hydro logy and Earth System Sciences (volu me 22, issue number 1). The article h ighlights choice of inappropriate methodology and faulty assumptions by 10 the authors for analysing the watershed scale hydrological changes, generating misleading results and inferences.
Abstract. This article is a critique on the paper Spatial characterization of long-term hydrological change in the Arkavathy watershed adjacent to Bangalore, India, by Penny et al. (2018), published in the journal of Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (volume 22, issue number 1). Penny et al. (2018) have applied a methodology for analysing long-term hydrological changes by treating a gauged watershed as a un-gauged one. The arguments presented in this article highlights choice of inappropriate methodology (for a watershed which is actually gauged) and faulty assumptions by Penny et al. (2018) for analysing the watershed scale hydrological changes, generating misleading results and inferences.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.