Differences in cytokine patterns in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), exacerbated COPD, smokers without apparent COPD, and healthy volunteers should be of interest for pathophysiological and therapeutic reasons. Methods including lavage, biopsy and sputum have been employed to investigate cytokines in the lung. For asystematic comparison, exhaled breath condensate (EBC) appears to be well suited. We investigated healthy volunteers, smokers without apparent COPD, stable and exacerbated COPD patients (+/- inhalative steroids) and finally those whose exacerbation made mechanical ventilation inevitable, for a more complete picture of inflammatory cytokines in COPD. We chose EBC because it is non-invasive and can be used repeatedly in spontaneous breathing individuals and during mechanical ventilation. EBC cytokines (IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 p 70, TNF-alpha) were assayed from a single sample using a multiplex array test kit. We observed a significant increase of all cytokines in acute exacerbation compared to stable COPD, smokers, and volunteers. Stable COPD and volunteers exhibited only small differences in cytokine pattern with respect to IL-1 beta and IL-12 (P<0.01). Smokers had increased levels of all investigated cytokines (P<0.01) compared to non-smokers and, with the exception of IL-1 beta, to stable COPD. Inhaled steroids resulted in reduced levels of IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-12 (all: P<0.01) in stable COPD (all: ex-smokers) with dose dependency for IL-8, IL-1 beta and IL-12. EBC analysis successfully characterized important differences in stable COPD compared to exacerbation or smoking and non-smoking healthy individuals.
Background: To improve monitoring of lung diseases, we analyzed cytokines in exhaled breath condensate (EBC). The main challenge in measurement of cytokines in EBC is the low protein content, which requires concentration steps that conflict with the need for excessive fluid required by most commonly used kits. Methods: Here, a multiplex bead array for the detection of interleukins (IL) -1b, -6, -8, -10, TNF-a, and IL-12p70 was modified and validated for analysis in EBC samples. Furthermore, 33 healthy volunteers and 11 patients with acute lung injury were investigated.
To induce an immunogenic response in vivo, an antigen-presenting (stimulator) cell must present both antigen-specific (class II MHC) and an accessory signal to the CD4 T cell. Failure to express the accessory signal has been shown in vitro to induce a state of specific unresponsiveness (anergy) in the T cell. We have shown that although stimulator cells in blood continue to express class II MHC molecules during refrigerated storage, their ability to present the accessory signal diminishes, reaching zero in all units tested by about 13 days. This implies that blood in excess of 2 weeks old should not alloimmunize but could induce some degree of immunosuppression. UV-B irradiation and, to a lesser extent, gamma-irradiation, were also shown to inhibit expression of the accessory signal by stimulator cells in blood.
To induce an immunogenic response in vivo, an antigen-presenting (stimulator) cell must present both antigen-specific (class II MHC) and an accessory signal to the CD4 T cell. Failure to express the accessory signal has been shown in vitro to induce a state of specific unresponsiveness (anergy) in the T cell. We have shown that although stimulator cells in blood continue to express class II MHC molecules during refrigerated storage, their ability to present the accessory signal diminishes, reaching zero in all units tested by about 13 days. This implies that blood in excess of 2 weeks old should not alloimmunize but could induce some degree of immunosuppression. UV-B irradiation and, to a lesser extent, gamma-irradiation, were also shown to inhibit expression of the accessory signal by stimulator cells in blood.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.