BackgroundThe incidence and prevalence of CNS involvement in SLE remains unclear owing to conflicting results in the published studies. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence and prevalence of major definite CNS events in SLE patients.Methods370 SLE patients with no previous history of CNS involvement were prospectively evaluated in a tertiary hospital referral center for 3 years. Major CNS manifestations were codified according to ACR definitions, including chorea, aseptic meningitis, psychosis, seizures, myelopathy, demyelinating syndrome, acute confusional state and strokes. Minor CNS events were excluded. ECLAM and SLEDAI-SELENA Modification scores were used to evaluate disease activity and SLICC/ACR Damage Index was used to assess accumulated damage.Results16/370 (4.3%) patients presented with a total of 23 major CNS events. These included seizures (35%), strokes (26%), myelopathy (22%), optic neuritis (8.7%), aseptic meningitis (4.3%) and acute psychosis (4.3%). Incidence was 7.8/100 person years. Among hospitalizations for SLE, 13% were due to CNS manifestations. Epileptic seizures were associated with high disease activity, while myelopathy correlated with lower disease activity and NMO-IgG antibodies (P≤0.05). Stroke incidence correlated with APS coexistence (P = 0.06). Overall, CNS involvement correlated with high ECLAM and SLEDAI scores (P<0.001).ConclusionsClinically severe CNS involvement is rare in SLE patients, accounting for 7.8/100 person years. CNS involvement correlates with high disease activity and coexistence of specific features that define the respective CNS syndromes.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

ObjectiveTo assess whether canakinumab, a monoclonal antibody against IL-1β approved for autoinflammatory diseases, is effective as target-specific therapy in patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM).MethodsBecause in sIBM IL-1β colocalizes with amyloid precursor protein and upregulates amyloid aggregates enhancing degeneration, targeting IL-1β with canakinumab may arrest disease progression. On this basis, 5 ambulatory patients with sIBM participated in an institutional review board--approved open-labeled study with 150 mg canakinumab [4 bimonthly, then monthly subcutaneous injections] for a mean period of 15.8 months. Patients were assessed bimonthly with a manual dynamometer in 12 proximal and distal muscles and with grip force (GF) in both hands. Total muscle strength (TMS) was expressed in kilograms. Efficacy was defined as >15% increased strength after 12 months.ResultsPatient 1 stopped at month 5 because of 23% loss in TMS and 32.35% in GF; patient 2 showed 37.1% increase in TMS and 13% in GF by month 9; patient 3 exhibited 26.7% reduction in TMS and 10% in GF at month 33; patient 4 showed 6.5% reduction in TMS and 1.6% in GF after 15 months, denoting relative stability; and patient 5 showed 30.4% loss in TMS and 20.8% in GF after 18 months. In patients 2 and 4, in whom 3-year longitudinal data were available, no effect on disease progression was noted.ConclusionsIn this long-term, open-label study, canakinumab showed small, but not clinically appreciable, stabilizing benefits in 2 of 5 patients with sIBM over 1 year, was ineffective in 2 others, and might have worsened one. No patient improved.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class IV evidence that canakinumab was ineffective for patients with sIBM.