Two linguistic-based voting systems have been introduced in recent years, namely: Majority Judgement (Balinski and Laraki in http://ceco.polytechnique.fr/ jugement-majoritaire.html, 2007a) and Range Voting (Smith in http://www.math. temple.edu/~wds/homepage/rangevote.pdf, 2000). The keys for them are aggregation procedures based on the median and the arithmetic mean of the grades assessed to the alternatives, respectively. In this paper a comprehensive framework based on centered OWA operators (Yager in Soft Comput 11:631-639, 2007a) and the 2-tuple model (Herrera and Martínez in IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8: [746][747][748][749][750][751][752] 2000) is provided to enclose such distinct approaches. In addition, we show how to avoid some drawbacks of Majority Judgement and Range Voting by means of the use of suitable aggregation functions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.