The achievement of a Trademark in order to become famous is not an easy job, the obstacle of building a Trademark into a well-known trademark is a factor that encourages the emergence of fraudulent competition that is detrimental to others. The Issuance of Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications is deemed unable to accommodate fraudulent competition. This study aims to examine the law politics of famous Trademark protection in terms of the development of Trademark law in Indonesia and to compare the protection of famous Trademarks in Indonesia with other countries to avoid fraudulent competition in the use Trademarks. This study is applied a normative juridical approach. The results of the study show that even though Indonesia has made amendment toward Trademark Law (UUM) 5 times, there is no specific definition of a well-known brand within Indonesia. Indonesia does not yet have arrangements regarding fraudulent competition in the brand, even though Indonesia has anti-competition laws, but fraudulent competition in Indonesia does not use it as a legal basis.Keywords: Trademark; Well-Known Trademark; Fraudulent Competition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.