An analysis of the role of galleries, libraries, archives and museums as a source of information for public knowledge was conducted. This study aims to find out how the collaborative role of galleries, libraries and archives in disseminating knowledge information sources to the public. The study was conducted using a narrative review which was complemented by observations via the web. The results of the analysis show that institutions that have collaborated include merging and collaborating with regional libraries and archives located in provinces and districts as well as cities throughout Indonesia. The libraries and galleries that have joined are the Fiction Literacy Library and Gallery in Surabaya. For libraries and museums that have joined or collaborated are the Zoological Museum, Tobacco Library and Museum, Soil and Agriculture Museum, and the Geological Museum. As for the combination or collaboration of museums and galleries, they are the Natural History Museum and the Youth Pledge Museum. Referring to the merger between libraries and archives, between libraries and museums, as well as between museums and galleries, it is hoped that the concept of merging or convergence of the roles of galleries, libraries, archives and museums in disseminating regulatory science and technology to the public.

Artikel ini mengkaji tentang pengelolaan repositori di Lembaga Penelitian dengan Status PUI. Data diperolah melalui wawancara dan kuesioner. Wawancara dilakukan terhadap pengelola repositori yang mempunyai kapasitas dan kemampuan dalam mengelola repositori. Sedangkan kuesioner disebarkan melalui email Lembaga Penelitian dengan status PUI. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa lembaga penelitian dengan status PUI sebagian besar sudah memiliki repositori. Repositori berfungsi tempat penyimpanan data dan karya ilmiah untuk jangka panjang dalam bentuk digital. Repositori memudahkan orang untuk menelusur atau merujuk data dan karya penelitian lain. Ketersediaan repositori institusi dapat memfasilitasi antar disiplin ilmu. Faktor yang mendorong penggunaan repositori adalah tampilan web repositori menarik, dilengkapi dengan fasilitas penyimpanan dan pencarian data serta mudah diakses. Sedangkan faktor yang menghambat penggunaan repositori adalah lembaga penelitian belum mewajibkan peneliti untuk menyimpan data penelitian dalam repositori. Faktor lain yang menghambat penggunaan repositori adalah perilaku peneliti yang tidak melakukan backup data. Untuk meningkatkan pengelolaan repositori di lembaga penelitian diperlukan kebijakan yang mewajibakan peneliti menyimpan datanya di repositori serta memberikan sanksi kepada peneliti yang tidak menyimpan datanya di repositori. Diperlukan sosialisasi yang dilakukan secara berkala agar para peneliti sadar akan pentingnya data dan karya hasil penelitian. Kata kunci: Repositori institusi; pengelolaan data penelitian; lembaga penelitian

National regulations in science and technology mandate researchers, research institutions, and research funders to store and share research data. However, research institutions in Indonesia have not widely practiced research data management by utilizing institutional repositories. This study aimed to determine the development of repositories in research institutions under the Center of Excellence (PUI) supervision program from three aspects: policy, infrastructure, and organizational culture. This research used a quantitative approach through descriptive methods. Data was collected from the management of the research institute repository under the supervision program of the Center of Excellence (PUI), a program of the Ministry of Research and Technology/the National Research and Innovation Agency. The data were analyzed descriptively to see how the repository's development supported research activities. The study results indicated that most institutions had policies for managing institutional repositories on the policy side and needed to be reinforced by policies for managing research data. On the infrastructure aspect, most research institutions did not yet have a repository for research data management. While on aspects of cultural organization, most researchers realized that collaborative research activities could benefit from the institutional repository. This study concludes that research institutions can develop existing institutional repositories for research data management by reinforcing policies, improving the infrastructure function of institutional repositories, and building a culture of data management through campaigns and outreach.

No abstract