In this study we evaluated the floral attributes of planted seagrass beds as they developed over time. The seagrasses Halodule wrightii and Syrjngodiurn filiforrne were planted on 0.5 m centers at several sites within Tampa Bay, Florida, USA. Planting unit (PU) survival, change in areal shoot density, plant morphometrics and associated macroalgae were monitored over a 3 yr period. These parameters were compared with nearby, natural beds as a reference. Comparisons were not limited to the same species, but lncluded Thalassia testudinum in order to address management issues regarding the substitution of one habitat type for another. Despite use of experienced personnel, in some plantings, a n average 47 % loss of PU was sustained, apparently due to seasonal b~oturbation. Depending on the spat~a l d~stribution of loss, persistent cover at equivalent dens~ties was still attained within 1.8 yr (for plantlngs on 0 5 m centers) over portions of some planted sites. Seagrass recovery rate and recommended monltonng tlmes have a positive, linear relationship to spaclng of plantings. Although moderately variable, areal shoot density clearly defined trends in bed development over time. Many plantings exhib~t e d httle spread in the first year after planting, and then expanded rapidly in the second year. Seagrass surface area, length or biomass, as well as macroalgal biomass, proved to be weak indicators of system development for most seagrass species. Although substantial PU losses were experienced, the subsequent survival, spread and persistence of seagrasses indicate that large areas of Tampa Bay, which historically had supported seagrass, are now suitable for restoration. For remaining seagrass habitat however, conservation provides a more certain basis for maintaining the resource than attempting to mitigate through planting.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.