One of the manifestations of the government's alignment with the protection and development of MSMEs is the issuance of Law Number 20 of 2008 concerning Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (UU MSMEs). Protection of MSME products is protection for products consisting of goods and/or services. Every product, both goods and services, has material and immaterial wealth. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), especially trademarks, are immaterial wealth for MSME products that need legal protection. This study aims to analyze the role of the Kebumen district government in accommodating the registration of MSME product brands. This study uses a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach. The legal materials used in this study include primary and secondary legal materials. Primary legal materials are Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications, Regulation of the Regent of Kebumen Number 71 of 2016 concerning Position, Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions, as well as Work Procedures for the Department of Manpower and Cooperatives, MSME (MSME Kebumen Regent Regulation). Secondary legal materials are journaled articles, law books and websites. The results of the study indicate the role of the Kebumen Regency Government in accommodating trademark registration on MSME products in Kebumen Regency through the KUMKM Service and the KUMKM Integrated Business Service Center (PLUT). Activities carried out are in the form of socialization, consulting services, training, and assistance for MSMEs in trademark registration at the DJKI to protect the law and develop MSMEs.

The problems in this study include the limitations of the right to integrity in moral rights concerning freedom of expression and the comparative protection of Moral Rights in Indonesia, France, America and Germany. This study is a normative juridical method with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and a comparative approach using primary materials, secondary materials and tertiary materials. The research specifications used are analytical descriptive. The technique of collecting data uses the library research method. The results of the study indicate that there is a limit for users in using the Work of others following Article 27-29 of the ITE Law and the principle of fair use in the provisions of Article 43-50 Copyright Law 2014, and in other clauses using Three-Step Test Analysis (TST). Comparing moral rights protection in Indonesia, France, America, and Germany show equality in regulations due to ratifying the Berne Convention. The fundamental difference is seen in the arrangements in the United States, which focus more on the principle of expediency (Creator Economic Rights) than Moral Rights as in the performance of the State of Indonesia, France, and Germany.

The paper responds on critical aspects between Indonesian Foreign Direct Investment Regulation (FDI) Act and China Foreign Investment Laws (FIL). China is relatively more developed, socially and economically over other countries, as viewed by scholars and foreign investors as an ideal place for foreign direct investment, partly due to its well-educated population, low labor costs, natural resources, and the adoption of an open-door policy. China have made remarkable FDI accomplishment through their own ways. Meanwhile, Indonesia is using an omnibus legislative strategy to entice foreign investors to invest in the country by modifying 74 FDI regulations. The study took a comparative approach to normative legal research. In addition, the goal of this study is to introduce the FDI legal model to Indonesia. And explores the debate issue on whether creating the omnibus law is a contradiction to Indonesian legal system. Moreover, intends to conclude by arguing that Indonesia should reconsider the omnibus law approach and refer to the lesson from the experience of China and Singapore.