Characterization of microscale features and mineral distributions in rock samples can be facilitated non-destructively with imaging analysis. Scanning electron microscopy combined with backscattered electron and energy-dispersive spectroscopy is particularly valuable and can be utilized to identify minerals. Mineral segmentation coupled with quantitative image processing can yield mineral volume fractions and accessibility from these images. Prior estimates of mineral accessibility from images have improved the simulations of mineral reaction rates, but it is unclear how pore connectivity should be accounted for. This is further complex in samples with clay minerals where nanopores in clays need to be considered. Here, the impacts of different approaches to assess pore connectivity on quantification of mineral accessibility are considered for seven sandstone samples with varying composition. Mineral accessibilities are calculated by counting the interfacial pixels between the associated minerals and the adjacent pores from the 2D mineral segmented maps. Three types of accessibilities are considered: the first approach accounts for all the macropore space, the second approach considers only the 2D connected macropores, and the third approach includes the 2D connected porosity considering nanopores in clays. The observed variations in accessibility for most mineral phases are within 1 order of magnitude when nanopore connectivity is considered and thus not anticipated to largely impact the simulated reactivity of samples. However, greater variations were observed for clay minerals, which may impact long-term simulations (years). Larger variations in accessibility were also noted for carbonate minerals, but only some samples contained carbonate phases, and additional data is needed to assess the trends.
The mineral reactive surface area is often quantified through a wide range of approaches (e.g., Brunauer−Emmett− Teller adsorption, geometry approximation, and imaging techniques). As such, values vary 1−5 orders of magnitude which can result in large discrepancies when used in reactive transport models to simulate geochemical reaction rates. Simulations carried out using mineral accessible surface areas (ASAs) determined from a coupled 2D and 3D imaging approach have shown better match with reaction rates measured in core-flood experiments. However, such image processing requires large amounts of time and resources. In this work, the possibility of estimating mineral ASAs from easily measured properties like mineral abundance and porosity is explored. Six sandstone samples of varying compositions were studied along with data from three additional samples from the previous literature. Mineral ASAs were quantified using a combined 2D scanning electron microscopy and 3D X-ray nano-computed tomography imaging approach. Sample properties like mineral accessibility, mineral ASAs, connected porosity, and clay content were compared to explore potential correlations between properties. Overall, it was observed that mineral accessibility can be predicted where feldspar mineral accessibility generally increases with increasing abundance and quartz accessibility decreases with increasing clay content. Mineral ASAs vary between samples, depending on the relative abundance of minerals and overall pore connectivity. While the ASA of quartz decreases with abundance, albite and carbonate mineral ASAs increase with abundance. Quantitative observations, including predictive relationships for ASAs from porosity and mineral volume fraction, are developed. Estimations of ASAs and mineral accessibility from more easily quantifiable properties can largely reduce the required extent of image analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.