None.

Background:Observational studies have reported a modest association between obesity and risk of ovarian cancer; however, whether it is also associated with survival and whether this association varies for the different histologic subtypes are not clear. We undertook an international collaborative analysis to assess the association between body mass index (BMI), assessed shortly before diagnosis, progression-free survival (PFS), ovarian cancer-specific survival and overall survival (OS) among women with invasive ovarian cancer.Methods:We used original data from 21 studies, which included 12 390 women with ovarian carcinoma. We combined study-specific adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) using random-effects models to estimate pooled HRs (pHR). We further explored associations by histologic subtype.Results:Overall, 6715 (54%) deaths occurred during follow-up. A significant OS disadvantage was observed for women who were obese (BMI: 30–34.9, pHR: 1.10 (95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.99–1.23); BMI: ⩾35, pHR: 1.12 (95% CI: 1.01–1.25)). Results were similar for PFS and ovarian cancer-specific survival. In analyses stratified by histologic subtype, associations were strongest for women with low-grade serous (pHR: 1.12 per 5 kg m−2) and endometrioid subtypes (pHR: 1.08 per 5 kg m−2), and more modest for the high-grade serous (pHR: 1.04 per 5 kg m−2) subtype, but only the association with high-grade serous cancers was significant.Conclusions:Higher BMI is associated with adverse survival among the majority of women with ovarian cancer.

Objectives To correlate levels of angiogenic growth factors with Doppler ultrasound parameters in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Methods

No abstract

Evidence for a role of ovarian factors in the growth of metastatic breast cancer was first recognized over 100 years ago. Today, anti-estrogens are central to the treatment of breast cancer of all stages. We now understand that the action of estrogen is mediated by the estrogen receptors (ER) which are members of the nuclear receptor family of ligand-regulated transcription factors. In this article we review the molecular mechanisms through which ER activates transcription of target genes and through which available anti-estrogens mediate their therapeutic effects. We discuss possible mechanisms of failure of treatment with current anti-estrogens and how newer anti-estrogens under development attempt to address these problems. In addition an expanded view of the molecular mechanisms of estrogen action is leading to the development of novel selective ER modulators or SERMs.European Journal of Endocrinology 150 243-255