To assess the practical prognostic value of c-erbB2, we performed a study on 942 invasive ductal carcinomas treated with primary surgery between 1980 and 1986 in our center. We evaluated its expression by immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded tissue using a polyclonal antipeptide antibody. Of 942 tumors, 229 (24%) showed a positive membrane staining. We observed a significant association between c-erbB2 and Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grading (p < 0.0001) and a negative correlation between c-erbB2 and both estrogen and progesterone receptors (p < 0.0001). In our analysis, with respect to overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS), c-erbB2 was statistically significant (p < or = 0.0001) for the whole group and the node-positive subgroup. In multivariate analysis, c-erbB2 appeared to be an independent variable for RFS and MFS in the node-negative group. However, in our hands, c-erbB2 had a poor prognostic value in comparison with the classical prognostic variables such as histological grade, nodal status (N), hormonal receptor status (estrogen and progesterone receptors), and tumor size, and it did not supersede the classical parameters.
Summary Tamoxifen as sole initial therapy is gaining importance in the management of post-menopausal breast cancer patients. Age, oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor status are accurately considered to select patients for hormonal treatment. However, additional markers are needed. By immunohistochemistry (IHC), we studied tumour expression of ER, PR, pS2, c-erbB-2 and glutathione S-transferase 7r (GSTh) on initial core biopsies of 208 post-menopausal patients with a non-metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma, treated by neoadjuvant tamoxifen therapy. A good response to tamoxifen was defined as tumoral regression >50% (110 patients). Relationship between response and age, tumour size, T, N, histological grade, ER and PR contents evaluated by radioimmunoassay, ER, PR, pS2, c-erbB-2 and GSTx expression evaluated by IHC were studied. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that tumoral regression was linked only to pS2 (P = 0.004) and ER (P=0.018) IHC expression. According to the immunohistochemical profile, three groups could be defined: pS2-and ER-positive tumours, pS2-or ER-positive tumours and pS2-and ER-negative tumours with response rates of 60%, 45% and 8% respectively. Although prospective studies are needed to confirm these results, we conclude that pS2 and ER immunohistochemical status are useful tools for predicting tumour regression with neoadjuvant tamoxifen in post-menopausal breast carcinoma patients.
Summary Seventy-four post-menopausal patients with primary non-metastatic invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast were first treated with tamoxifen alone (30 mg p.o. daily) for 5 months. To study changes induced by tamoxifen, core biopsies before treatment and surgical specimens after hormonal therapy were assayed by immunohistochemistry for oestrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR), pS2, GSTh and c-erbB-2. After tamoxifen, ER and PR significantly decreased in 60 and 44 cases respectively, whereas 11 and 19 cases showed no variation and 2 and II cases showed an increase (P< 10-4). GSTir and pS2 showed a significant increase in 43 and 41 cases, a decrease in 2 and 21 cases and no variation in 29 and 12 cases (P<.10-4 and P=0.04 respectively). c-erbB-2 showed no significant variation under tamoxifen, increased in only three cases and decreased in 13 cases. No relation was found between these variations and efficiency of hormone therapy. Our results allow a better knowledge of protein expression modifications occurring in breast cancer cells under tamoxifen therapy. They are also more consistent with clone selection rather than with phenotype modification.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.