In this paper, a new weighting sum method for multi-criteria decision making is presented. The main advantage of this method is that it is easier for understanding and it can effectively be handled by a decision maker, so the obtained solution best suits his goal and his understanding of the problem.
In all practical problems associated with the selection and assessment, almost always criteria have different importance. The priorities of criteria are expressed by weighted coefficients. Every decision maker has to establish criteria priority scale. This can be done directly-degrees of criteria importance defined by judgment of experts, or indirectly-degrees of criteria importance calculated by alternatives themselves. Many multi-criteria decision methods allow some kind of compensatory between criteria. The low performance on an important criterion can be redeemed in overall aggregation by good performance on few other less important criteria. In this paper, we present the method which provides that such an important piece of information must be preserved: If an alternative does not satisfy a dominant criterion, then its overall aggregation value is zero.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.