No abstract

Abstract. This study compared in vitro dissolution characteristics and other quality measures of different amoxicillin, metronidazole, and zidovudine products purchased in the Americas to a comparator pharmaceutical product (CPP). These three drugs are classified as Biopharmaceutics Classification System Class I drugs with the possibility that dissolution findings might be used to document bioequivalence. All investigated zidovudine products were found to be in vitro equivalent to the CPP. Only 3 of 12 tested amoxicillin products were found to be in vitro equivalent to the CPP. None of the tested metronidazole products were in vitro equivalent to the CPP. These findings suggest but do not confirm bioinequivalence where in vitro comparisons failed, given that an in vivo blood level study might have confirmed bioequivalence. At times, identifying a CPP in one of the selected markets proved difficult. The study demonstrates that products sold across national markets may not be bioequivalent. When coupled with the challenge of identifying a CPP in different countries, the results of this study suggest the value of an international CPP as well as increased use of BCS approaches as means of either documenting bioequivalence or signaling the need for further in vivo studies. Because of increased movement of medicines across national borders, practitioners and patients would benefit from these approaches.

The USP General Chapter <2040> Disintegration and Dissolution of Dietary Supplements introduced a rupture test as a performance test of soft-shell capsules. Traditionally, the disintegration test was used for determining the disintegration time of all solid oral dosage forms. The aim of this investigation was to investigate differences between the rupture test and the disintegration test using soft-shell capsules.Five different soft-shell capsule products were chosen based on their filling contents and treated to simulate a production deficiency. The study design compared capsules as received with capsules that were treated by coating them with the liquid contents of another capsule. The capsules were incubated at room temperature and at 40 °C. The tests were repeated after two weeks, and at each time point, twelve capsules of each product were tested using the rupture and the disintegration tests. Six capsules were tested untreated, while the other six capsules were treated. Rupture and disintegration times were recorded as dependent variables in each experiment. The data were analyzed using ANOVA.According to the USP definition for disintegration, the rupture of a soft-shell capsule can be seen as fulfilling the disintegration criterion if the capsule contents is a semisolid or liquid. Statistical analysis showed no advantage of the rupture test over the disintegration test. On a product-by-product basis, both tests were sensitive to certain investigated parameters. A noticeable difference between both tests was that in most cases, the rupture test reached the defined endpoint faster than the disintegration test.Soft-shell capsules that are subject to a Quality by Design approach should be tested with both methods to determine which performance test is the most appropriate test for a specific product.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is an ocular inflammatory diseases treated mainly by means of a bevacizumab (Avastin ® ) or ranibizumab (Lucentis ® ) intravitreal injection. Among these drugs, only ranibizumab has a specific therapeutic indication for AMD. Considering that, the off-label use on ophthalmic therapy seems to become a rule when it should be an exception. Furthermore, bevacizumab presentation consists of multi-dose vials although it does not contain preservatives in its formula. The current literature review aimed at assessing the risks for the patient related to the use of off-label indication and multi-dose vials on AMD treatment. Considering this, the proposal related to the Brazilian Public Consultation no.10, dated September 12, 2012, which proposes the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines for AMD treatment, was evaluated. This systematic review allowed to conclude that the bevacizumab off-label indication results in increased risks for the patient when compared to the product with specific therapeutic indication for AMD treatment (ranibizumab), especially referring to the significant raise in the adverse events. The risks for the patient related to the multi-dose vial use, referring to the microbiological stability and dose precision, were also made clear.Uniterms: Age-related macular degeneration/treatment. Ranibizumab/intravitreal injection. Bevacizumab/ intravitreal injection. Ophthalmic therapy/off-label use. Off-label indication/patients risks. Multi-dose vials/patients risks.A degeneração macular relacionada à idade (DMRI) é uma doença ocular inflamatória tratada principalmente por injeção intravítrea de bevacizumabe (Avastin ® ) ou de ranibizumabe (Lucentis ® ). Entre os medicamentos citados, apenas o ranibizumabe tem indicação terapêutica específica para uso oftálmico. Considerando essa realidade, o uso off-label na terapia oftálmica parece constituir regra quando deveria ser exceção. Ademais, a apresentação do bevacizumabe consiste em frascos de múltipla-dose, embora esse medicamento não contenha conservante em sua fórmula. A presente revisão da literatura avaliou os riscos ao paciente relativos ao uso indicado off-label e de frascos de múltipla-dose no tratamento de DMRI. Nesse sentido, avaliou-se a proposta relativa à Consulta Pública Brasileira nº 10, de 12 de setembro de 2012, que propõe o Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas para o tratamento de DMRI. O levantamento sistemático de trabalhos científicos e de informações relevantes de banco de dados eletrônicos permitiu concluir que a indicação off-label do bevacizumabe acarreta riscos maiores ao paciente, quando comparado ao produto com indicação terapêutica específica para o tratamento de DMRI (ranibizumabe), especialmente quanto ao aumento significativo de eventos adversos. Evidenciaramse, também, os riscos ao paciente relativos ao uso de frascos de múltipla-dose, quanto à estabilidade microbiológica e à precisão da dose.Unitermos: Degeneração macular /tratamento. Ranibizumabe/injeção intravítrea. Bevacizuma...

TABELA 16 Valores em UFC/placa Obtidos no Teste para Comprovar a Inativação do Sistema Conservante. o = Solução Fisiológica estéril (controle) As fórmulas de 1 a 18 foram avaliadas nas diluições 1:10 UFC = Unidade Formadora de Colônia ND = Não detectado nas condições experimentais