Rights, legal regulations, and practices often arise from societal and scientific developments, and societal transformations may originate from new legal regulations as well. Basic rights can be re-defined with advancements in science and technology. In such an evolutional loop, where mutual supply is obvious, combined legal and technological frameworks should be exercised and developed for practicing human rights. The main aim of this article is to propose a conceptual and methodological framework for the improvement of disability rights in the light of recent advancements in geographic information science (GIScience), in particular for those with motor disabilities, for whom questions related to “where” are essential. The concept of disability is discussed, considering different aspects, and a new methodological framework is proposed in which Geographic Information Systems (GIS), volunteered geographic information (VGI) and citizen science are at the core. In order to implement the framework at the national and international levels, a spatial data model should be developed first. The new data collection and interpretation approaches based on VGI, citizen science, and machine learning methods may help to realize equal rights for people with motor disabilities, by enabling improved access to education, health, and travel.

Yargı kararlarının gerekçelerinin sağlam argümanlar içeriyor olması demokratik hukuk devleti açısından önemlidir. Sağlam argümanların en temel özelliği ise mantık hatalarından arınmış olmasıdır. Bu çalışmada hukukta sıklıkla başvurulan mantık hatalarından ad hominem ele alınacaktır. Karalama olarak nitelendirilen ad hominem, "kötüleyici karalama", "niteliksel karalama", "önyargı karalaması", "zehirli kuyu karalaması", "sen de karalaması" ve "post mortem karalama" olmak üzere altı farklı tür açısından incelenecek ve somut yargı kararları bağlamında örneklendirilecektir.

This paper focuses on the issue of whether the boundaries of the private lives of judges are shaped according to cultural conditions and gender. My main assumption is that gender inequality in a culture is reflected in how the boundaries of the private life of judges are interpreted. In this regard, women judges may face more restrictions than their male colleagues in what they wear, what they do and what they say in their lives generally. And ultimately, an interpretation of private life that reinforces gender roles also limits the freedom of expression. I concretise my discussion regarding gender stereotypes that influence what judges do or say in their private lives in different cultures.

This study aims to introduce William Twining's global view of law,which is shaped through the criticisms of the mainstream legal philosophy.Based on a multi-lensed, critical, contextual, and empirical perspective,Twining discusses what kind of framework should jurisprudence offer toaddress the problems posed by globalization. This framework is alsoimportant in terms of providing solutions to the legal problems shaped by thecharacteristics of the 21st century. The study aims to highlight the main pointsof Twining's approach, in this regard, the basic concepts and principlesemphasized by the author will be discussed. In this direction, the author'sconcern to explain where he stands and evaluates, his criticisms of mainstreamjurisprudence, and the outlines of the global jurisprudence approach he putforward in line with these criticisms will be discussed. The term "standpoint",which Twining uses to emphasize that the researcher's background andposition shapes his perspective on the subject he researches, and the term"travel well", which he uses for the meaningful replacement of (legal)concepts between different legal cultures, will be discussed within the scopeof the subject.

Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi’nin Evans v Birleşik Krallık davası, soyut hukuk kurallarının somut olay adaletini sağlamada zayıf kaldığı ve bu anlamda hâkimlerin yorumunun büyük önem taşıdığı bir örnektir. Bu makalede Evans v Birleşik Krallık davası temelinde hâkimin somut olayı ve olaydaki kişilerin durumunu görmesi üzerine bir değerlendirme yapılmaktadır. Değerlendirme ihtimam etiği ve ilişkisel özerklik teorisi ve Gülriz Uygur’un “adaletsizliği görmek” yaklaşımını temel alarak yapılmıştır.