Tumor cells aberrantly express chemokines and/or chemokine receptors, and some may promote tumor growth and metastasis. We examined the expression and function of chemokine receptor CXCR3 in a syngeneic murine model of metastatic breast cancer. By flow cytometry, CXCR3 was detected in all murine mammary tumor cell lines examined. All human breast cancer cell lines examined also expressed CXCR3, as did the immortalized but nontumorigenic MCF-10A cell line. Interaction of CXCR3 ligands, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, with CXCR3 on the highly malignant murine mammary tumor cell line 66.1 resulted in intracellular calcium mobilization and chemotaxis in vitro. To test the hypothesis that tumor metastasis is facilitated by CXCR3 expressed by tumor cells, we employed a small molecular weight antagonist of CXCR3, AMG487. 66.1 tumor cells were pretreated with AMG487 prior to i.v. injection into immunecompetent female mice. Antagonism of CXCR3 on 66.1 tumor cells inhibited experimental lung metastasis, and this antimetastatic activity was compromised in mice depleted of natural killer cells. Systemic administration of AMG487 also inhibited experimental lung metastasis. In contrast to the antimetastatic effect of AMG487, local growth of 66.1 mammary tumors was not affected by receptor antagonism. These studies indicate that murine mammary tumor cells express CXCR3 which facilitates the development of lung metastases. These studies also indicate for the first time that a small molecular weight antagonist of CXCR3 has the potential to inhibit tumor metastasis. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(15): 7701-7)

Breast tumor cells express the chemokine receptor CXCR3, which binds the ligands CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11. CXCR3 and other chemokine receptors may mediate tumor metastasis by supporting migration of tumor cells to sites of ligand expression including the lymph nodes, lungs, and bone marrow. We examined the relationship of CXCR3 expression to clinical outcome in 75 women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. We detected CXCR3 in malignant epithelium from all tumors. Twelve percent were weakly positive and 64% had moderate levels of CXCR3. Strong CXCR3-positive staining was observed in 24% of tumors. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that high CXCR3 expression was associated with poorer overall survival; the unadjusted hazard ratio was 1.56 and it was marginally significant (P = 0.07). When interactions between lymph node status and CXCR3 were considered, the adjusted hazard ratio for CXCR3 was 2.62 (P = 0.02) for women with nodenegative disease at diagnosis, whereas the hazard ratio for CXCR3 was not significant for those with node-positive disease. CXCR3 gene silencing inhibited lung colonization and spontaneous lung metastasis from mammary glandimplanted tumors in a murine model. The size or growth rate of the locally growing tumors was not affected. The antimetastatic effect of CXCR3 gene silencing was compromised in mice depleted of Natural Killer cells or with mutations in IFN-;, suggesting that the role of CXCR3 is not simply to mediate tumor cell trafficking. These studies support the continued examination of CXCR3 as a potential therapeutic target in patients with breast cancer. [Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(3):490 -8]

The COX-2 product prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) contributes to the high metastatic capacity of breast tumors. Our published data indicate that inhibiting either PGE2 production or PGE2-mediated signaling through the PGE2 receptor EP4 reduces metastasis by a mechanism that requires Natural Killer (NK) cells. It is known that NK cell function is compromised by PGE2, but very little is known about the mechanism by which PGE2 affects NK effector activity. We now report the direct effects of PGE2 on the NK cell. Endogenous murine splenic NK cells express all four PGE2 receptors (EP1-4). We examined the role of EP receptors in three NK cell functions; migration, cytotoxicity, and cytokine release. Like PGE2, the EP4 agonist PGE1-OH blocked NK cell migration to FBS and to four chemokines (ITAC, MIP-1α, SDF-1α, and CCL21). The EP2 agonist, Butaprost, inhibited migration to specific chemokines but not in response to FBS. In contrast to the inhibitory actions of PGE2, the EP1/EP3 agonist Sulprostone increased migration. Unlike the opposing effects of EP4 vs. EP1/EP3 on migration, agonists of each EP receptor were uniformly inhibiting to NK mediated cytotoxicity. The EP4 agonist, PGE1-OH, inhibited IFNγ production from NK cells. Agonists for EP1, 2, and 3 were not as effective at inhibiting IFNγ. Agonists of EP1, EP2, and EP4 all inhibited TNFα; EP4 agonists were the most potent. Thus, the EP4 receptor consistently contributed to loss of function. These results, taken together, support a mechanism whereby inhibiting PGE2 production or preventing signaling through the EP4 receptor may prevent suppression of NK functions that are critical to the control of breast cancer metastasis.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in epithelial tumors is frequently associated with a poor prognosis. In a murine model of metastatic breast cancer, we showed that COX-2 inhibition is associated with decreased metastatic capacity. The COX-2 product, prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ), acts through a family of G protein-coupled receptors designated EP1-4 that mediate intracellular signaling by multiple pathways. We characterized EP receptor expression on three murine mammary tumor cell lines and show that all four EP isoforms were detected in each cell. Stimulation of cells with either PGE 2 or the selective EP4/EP2 agonist PGE 1 -OH resulted in increased intracellular cyclic AMP and this response was inhibited with either EP2 or EP4 antagonists. Nothing is known about the function of EP receptors in tumor metastasis. We tested the hypothesis that the prevention of EP receptor signaling would, like inhibition of PGE 2 synthesis, inhibit tumor metastasis. Our results show for the first time that antagonism of the EP4 receptor with either AH23848 or ONO-AE3-208 reduced metastasis as compared with vehicletreated controls. The therapeutic effect was comparable to that observed with the dual COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor indomethacin. EP3 antagonism had no effect on tumor metastasis. Mammary tumor cells migrated in vitro in response to PGE 2 and this chemotactic response was blocked by EP receptor antagonists. Likewise, the proliferation of tumor cells was also directly inhibited by antagonists of either EP4 or EP1/EP2. These studies support the hypothesis that EP receptor antagonists may be an alternative approach to the use of COX inhibitors to prevent tumor metastasis. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(6): 2923-7)

It is well established that high cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression contributes to the aggressive behavior of breast and other malignancies. Due to concerns regarding the safety of long-term use of COX-2 inhibitors as well as a desire to seek more effective alternatives to prevent and treat metastatic disease, we tested the hypothesis that inhibition of downstream signaling by the COX-2 product prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ) would be as effective as inhibiting global prostaglandin synthesis. PGE 2 acts through four G-protein-coupled receptors designated EP1-4. Here, we summarize data from many laboratories regarding the role of individual E-series of prostaglandin (EP) receptors on cancer behavior and we discuss our own recent findings that antagonists of the PGE receptor subtype 4, EP4, inhibit experimental metastasis in a murine model of hormone-resistant, metastatic breast cancer. These initial results indicate that selective targeting of individual EP receptors should be investigated as an approach to exploit the high COX-2 activity in many epithelial malignancies. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(20): 9794-7) Cyclooxygenase-2 Is Highly Expressed in Breast CancerMany tumors and tumor cell lines, including breast, express elevated cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) protein levels that contribute to their malignant behavior (1). Epidemiologic studies indicate that chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs that inhibit Cox-mediated production of prostaglandins is associated with lower incidence of a number of tumor types, including breast cancers (2). In spite of recent advances in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancers, effective therapies are lacking for hormone-resistant and metastatic disease. Human breast cancers frequently have high PGE 2 levels and breast tumors with high COX-2 protein levels are more likely to metastasize (1).Protective effects of COX inhibitors both in preventing tumor induction and inhibiting growth of transplanted tumors are well established (3-5). Several mechanisms underlie these therapeutic effects. Direct effects of COX inhibitors on tumor cells have been shown, including inhibition of cancer cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis (6). Other studies support an indirect effect of COX inhibitors on tumor angiogenesis (4). COX inhibitors are also effective at limiting metastatic disease (3, 5). The antimetastatic effect depends on activation of natural killer (NK) cells (3, 7).The COX-2 Product Prostaglandin E 2 Acts through E-Series of Prostaglandin ReceptorsIn tumors, the principal COX-2 product is prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ). Cellular effects of PGE 2 are mediated through a family of G-protein-coupled receptors designated EP1,2,3 and EP4 (8). Despite structural and sequence similarities among the four E-series of prostaglandin (EP) receptors, they are coupled to different intracellular signaling pathways. Ligand binding of EP1 is associated with phospholipase C activation and elevations in intracellular calcium, whereas EP2 and EP4 are coupled to protein kinase ...