Introduction: Young men who have sex with men (YMSM) and young transgender women (YTGW) in Thailand are at high HIV risk. HIV self-tests (HIVSTs) are rapidly administrable and prompt linkage to HIV treatment or prevention services. This study assesses the acceptability and feasibility of blood-based HIVST use in adolescents. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among YMSM and YTGW aged 15–19 years with HIV acquisition risk. Participants completed questionnaires on the HIVST and then administered INSTI® independently, an HIVST immunoassay detecting gp41 and gp36 antibodies from finger-stick blood. Confirmatory HIV antibody tests were performed. Results: Between July and September 2020, 90 adolescents were enrolled. Mean (SD) age was 17.6 (1.1) years. Half ( N = 45) were YMSM. Forty-six (51%) were first-time HIV testers, and 32 (36%) had “ever used” HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Two (2.2%, 95% CI: 0.0–5.3) tested positive, 21 (23.4%) invalid, and 67 (74.4%) negative. Invalidity causes included 17 (81%) insufficient blood, 3 (14%) buffer spillage, and 1 (5%) procedural missteps; all had negative HIV antibody tests. HIV self-test acceptability was 87.8% (95% CI: 81.0–94.5). Most (79%) preferred HIVST performance in hospital rather than at home. Conclusions: HIVSTs are acceptable in HIV at-risk adolescents. Blood-based HIVSTs should be positioned as rapid point-of-care tests with real-time linkage to HIV services.

Introduction: Adolescents and young adults (AYA) have limited access to HIV screening tests despite the risk of acquiring HIV infection. This study aims to understand AYA preferences and their ability to perform HIV self-tests (HIVST). Methods: A cross-sectional study looked at AYA preferences when offered a choice between blood-based (INSTI®) and oral fluid-based (OraQuick®) HIVST. Adolescents and young adult participants between 18 and 24 years-old who report inconsistent condom use or had a history of sexually transmitted diseases were enrolled. Participants were offered a choice between blood-based and/or oral fluid-based HIVSTs with explanations of the differences between two types. Then, written and short video instructions according to the chosen type were given before participants performed a test. The study seeks to understand test preference, ability to perform and interpret test results. Results: From March to April 2021, 87 AYA were enrolled with a median age of 20 years (interquartile range (IQR) 18–22). Of the participants, 54 (62.1%) were men who have sex with men (MSM), 25 (28.7%) were cisgender men or women and 8 (9.2%) were transgender women (TGW). There were 37 (42.5%) first-time HIV testers and 32 (36.8%) HIV PrEP users. There were 57 participants (65.6%, 95% CI 54.6%–75.4%) that preferred blood-based HIVSTs. Reasons for preferring blood-based testing were the rapid results (77.2%) and higher accuracy (66.7%). The ability to perform and interpret HIVST results were 89.5% and 98% among INSTI users and 93.3% and 100.0% among OraQuick® users. None was HIV-positive. Moreover, 13.8% of the participants initiated same-day pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Conclusions: Thai AYA preferred blood-based over oral fluid-based HIVSTs. Most AYAs were able to perform the HIVSTs and interpret results. Supervision and post-test counselling of HIVSTs should be implemented to ensure AYA gain benefits from HIVSTs.

Background: Social network strategies (SNS) assumes that people in the same social share similar HIV risk. Methods: This study evaluated SNS to promote HIV testing of young men who have sex with men (YMSM) and transgender women (YTGW) aged 15–24 years. “Recruiters” referred their ‘network members’ (NMs) to clinic. NMs were provided HIV testing. Proportions of first-time HIV testers and number of NMs were analyzed. Results: Between April 2021 to March 2022, 83 recruiters referred 202 NMs. Median age of NMs was 19 years (IQR 17-20), 62% were YMSM. One-hundred-and-twenty-four NMs (61%) were first-time HIV testers. YTGW recruited more NMs per recruiter (5.4 vs 1.4, p  =  0.002). HIV prevalence was 3.0% (95% CI 1.1-6.4). Thirty-one-point-three percent of NMs at HIV risk initiated oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis. Conclusions: SNS is a good strategy to reach adolescents at risk of HIV infection. More than half of NMs were first-time HIV testers.