The rights and obligations of the state represented by the corresponding body or official are not specifically highlighted in the Directive. The certainty of some duties of the "representative" of the state can be concluded only by analysing the scope of refugee rights, because the procedural rights of a refugee are positive and for their implementation the state is obliged to take certain measures, otherwise these rights cannot be exercised. Consequently, the obligations of the state, represented by authorised persons, correspond to the rights of a refugee: if a refugee, for example, has the right to remain in the territory of the asylum state, the state must ensure that such refugee enjoys this right, including the

No abstract

No abstract

The purpose of the research. The scientific article is devoted to the coverage of the environmental protection funds as a component of national financial and environmental security. Main  content. It is substantiated that achieving the effectiveness of regulatory policy in the field of environmental protection requires the state to intensify the forms of its implementation, one of which is the activities of extra-budgetary trust funds. During the analysis of economic and sectoral extra-budgetary funds, the unification of legal regulation of the procedure for allocating funds provided to environmental funds was identified as a necessary measure, which will allow detailed regulation of such rules and establish a mechanism for liability for violations. Methodology:  Consideration of materials and methods based on the analysis of documentary materials for the environmental protection funds as a component of national financial and environmental security. Conclusions. The expediency of systematizing the legislation regulating extra-budgetary funds is argued for the purpose of further elaboration and adoption of the Law of Ukraine “On Public Funds”.Keywords: administrative service, environmental tax, government service, municipal service, electronic service, public service.

The purpose of the article is to characterize the grounds for the use of "cassation administrative filters" as part of the mechanism for exercising the right of an individual to cassation appeal against a court decision in a public law dispute. The subject of research is the peculiarities of cassation review of decisions in administrative proceedings. Methodology: The methodological basis for the article are general and special methods of legal science, in particular: the method of dialectical analysis, the method of prognostic modeling, formal and logical, normative and dogmatic, sociological methods. The results of the study: The current regulations on the right of an individual to cassation appeal against court decisions in administrative proceedings by characterizing the existing procedural filters are analyzed. Practical implication: Based on the study of the case law, the types of administrative cassation filters applied by the courts when reviewing the decisions are identified. Value / originality: It is proved that achieving the effectiveness of the application of cassation administrative filters requires a high level of professionalism, which ensures the proper implementation of the individual’s right to file a cassation appeal, and developing the unified approach to the use of assessment categories.