There was disagreement between the two expert opinions analysed in this study. A key factor was aneurysm size, with decision making at our centre seemingly more guided by older landmark papers such as work by the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) group. However, agreement was at its highest at the end of the study period, suggesting increasing convergence between the two bodies of expert opinion. The reasons for disagreement and particularly clinicians' reliance on aneurysm size in decision making is something that needs consideration when planning and auditing aneurysm services.