Formatted for AddictionThe cascade of care for opioid use disorder: a retrospective study in

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic was preceded by an ongoing overdose crisis and linked to escalating drug overdose deaths in British Columbia (BC). At the outset of these dual public health emergencies, the BC government announced interim Risk Mitigation Guidance (RMG) that permitted prescribing medication alternatives to substances, including opioids, alcohol, stimulants and benzodiazepines, an intervention sometimes referred to as ‘safe supply’. This protocol outlines the approach for a study of the implementation of RMG and its impacts on COVID-19 infection, drug-related and systemic harms, continuity of care for people with substance use disorder (SUD), as well as their behavioural, psychosocial and well-being outcomes.Methods and analysisWe conducted a parallel mixed-method study that involved both analysis of population-level administrative health data and primary data collection, including a 10-week longitudinal observational study (target n=200), a cross-sectional survey (target n=200) and qualitative interviews (target n=60). We implemented a participatory approach to this evaluation, partnering with people with lived or living expertise of drug use, and researchers and public health decision-makers across the province. Linked population-level administrative databases will analyse data from a cohort of BC residents with an indication of SUD between 1996 and 2020. We will execute high-dimensional propensity score matching and marginal structural modelling to construct a control group and to assess the impact of RMG dispensation receipt on a collaboratively determined set of primary and secondary outcomes.Ethics and disseminationStudy activities were developed to adhere to the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, recommended COVID-19 research practices, and guided by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action for public health, data governance and research ethics related to Indigenous people. Results will be disseminated incrementally, on an ongoing basis, through the consortium established for this study, then published in peer-reviewed journals.

IntroductionDespite a recent meta-analysis including 31 randomised controlled trials comparing methadone and buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder, important knowledge gaps remain regarding the long-term effectiveness of different treatment modalities across individuals, including rigorously collected data on retention rates and other treatment outcomes. Evidence from real-world data represents a valuable opportunity to improve personalised treatment and patient-centred guidelines for vulnerable populations and inform strategies to reduce opioid-related mortality. Our objective is to determine the comparative effectiveness of methadone versus buprenorphine/naloxone, both overall and within key populations, in a setting where both medications are simultaneously available in office-based practices and specialised clinics.Methods and analysisWe propose a retrospective cohort study of all adults living in British Columbia receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) with methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone between 1 January 2008 and 30 September 2018. The study will draw on seven linked population-level administrative databases. The primary outcomes include retention in OAT and all-cause mortality. We will determine the effectiveness of buprenorphine/naloxone vs methadone using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses—the former emulating flexible-dose trials and the latter focusing on the comparison of the two medication regimens offered at the optimal dose. Sensitivity analyses will be used to assess the robustness of results to heterogeneity in the patient population and threats to internal validity.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol, cohort creation and analysis plan have been approved and classified as a quality improvement initiative exempt from ethical review (Providence Health Care Research Institute and the Simon Fraser University Office of Research Ethics). Dissemination is planned via conferences and publications, and through direct engagement and collaboration with entities that issue clinical guidelines, such as professional medical societies and public health organisations.

No abstract

Background and Aims Multiple interventions and policy changes related to opioid agonist treatment (OAT) have been introduced in British Columbia, Canada to increase engagement and retention in OAT. We aimed to estimate the impact of policy changes and the announcement of the opioid overdose‐related public health emergency on the use of OAT for incarcerated individuals with opioid use disorder. Design Interrupted time‐series analysis. Events of interest included the expansion of buprenorphine/naloxone into provincial health‐care insurance coverage in October 2015 and the public health emergency declared in April 2016. Setting and Participants Our study included 9220 incarcerated individuals from 12 provincial corrections facilities in British Columbia, Canada for a total of 75 649 calendar months of incarceration. Measurements Monthly measures of OAT use during incarceration from 1 January 2013 to 30 September 2017. We estimated changes in OAT use, controlling for individual and facility‐level factors, using a general estimating equation, specified with a logit link and an autoregressive correlation matrix. Findings After the provincial health insurance coverage expansion, a sharp increase in OAT use during incarceration was observed [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.13, 1.19]. The public health emergency coincided with an immediate but temporary increase in OAT receipt (aOR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.22, 1.47). During the entire study period, we estimated a 10‐fold increase in the adjusted odds of OAT use during incarceration (aOR = 10.10, 95% CI = 8.98, 11.37). Conclusion Following an expansion of health‐care insurance coverage to include buprenorphine/naloxone, receipt of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) within correctional facilities in British Columbia, Canada increased, largely driven by an increase in buprenorphine/naloxone prescriptions among individuals without recent OAT experience.