Anecdotal reports abound of vision improving in myopia after a period of time without refractive correction. We explored whether this effect is due to an increased tolerance of blur or whether it reflects a genuine improvement in vision. Our results clearly demonstrated a marked improvement in the ability to detect and recognize letters following prolonged exposure to optical defocus. We ensured that ophthalmic change did not occur, and thus the phenomenon must be due to a neural compensation for the defocus condition. A second set of experiments measured contrast sensitivity and found a decrease in sensitivity to mid-range (5-25 cycles deg-1) spatial frequencies following exposure to optical defocus. The results of the two experiments may be explained by the unmasking of low contrast, high spatial frequency information via a two-stage process: (1) the pattern of relative channel outputs is maintained during optical defocus by the depression of mid-range spatial frequency channels; (2) channel outputs are pooled prior to the production of the final percept. The second set of experiments also provided some evidence of inter-ocular transfer, indicating that the adaptation process is occurring at binocular sites in the cortex.

While the accommodation system has been implicated in myopia development, the nature of this relationship remains obscure. This study investigated the differences in accommodation stimulus response curves between adult myopes and emmetropes. Myopic subjects were classified according to age of onset and stability of their myopia. Accommodation stimulus response curves were measured using three different methods: (i) real targets presented at viewing distances of 4 m to 0.25 m, (ii) a target at 4 m viewed through negative lenses of increasing power, and (iii) a target at 0.25 m viewed through positive lenses of decreasing power. A Canon Autoref R-1 measured the accommodation responses at 5 levels of demand (increasing from 0 D to 4 D in 1 D steps). We found significant differences between the three methods used to stimulate an accommodation response in all subject groups, for example, accommodation lags at high accommodative demands were greatest for the negative lens series and least for the positive lens series. In addition, while differences between early-onset myopes, late-onset myopes and emmetropes were not observed, we did observe differences when myopic subjects were reclassified according to whether their myopia was progressing or stable. A reduced accommodation response to negative lens-induced accommodative demand was found in progressing myopes but not in stable myopes. These results provide further evidence for the link between myopia progression and inaccurate accommodation. The data also suggest that adult myopes with stable refractive errors show accommodation responses similar to that of emmetropes.

The magnitude of the microfluctuations in the EMMs and EOMs may be influenced primarily by accommodation response-induced zonular relaxation effects or to changes in the physical properties of the accommodation plant with increasing accommodation response. The LOMs may have an increased baseline neural blur threshold, which appears to modulate the magnitude of the accommodative microfluctuations for low accommodation levels. At higher accommodation demands, the changes in the physical properties of the accommodation plant or the zonular relaxation effects appear to exceed the blur threshold, and the known association between microfluctuations and accommodation stimulus level is restored.

Our results suggest that hyperopia, like myopia, is predominantly axial in nature, although the corneal radius also plays a role in determining refractive error magnitude. These results have implications for refractive surgery and visual performance in hyperopic eyes.

The magnitude of accommodation microfluctuations increases in emmetropic subjects viewing low luminance targets or viewing a target through small artificial pupils. Larger microfluctuations reported in myopia may result from an abnormally large depth of focus (DoF). The effect of modulating the size of the DoF has not been investigated in myopic subjects and may help to explain the cause of the increased DoF. Accommodation microfluctuations were recorded under two experimental conditions. Firstly, 12 emmetropes (EMMs), and 24 myopes (MYOs) viewed a Maltese Cross target with luminance levels of 0.002, 0.2, 6 and 600cd/m(2) and in darkness, and second, 14 EMMs and 16 MYOs viewed a Maltese Cross target through pupil diameters of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5mm presented in Maxwellian view. The magnitude of the accommodation microfluctuations increased significantly with a target luminance of 0.002cd/m(2) (p<.03) and pinhole diameters of <2mm (p<.05). For all other luminance levels and pupil diameters the magnitude was constant. For both conditions, MYOs had significantly larger microfluctuations than EMMs (p<.01). Considerable inter-subject variability was observed in the degree to which the magnitude of the microfluctuations increased, for both the 0.002cd/m(2) luminance and 0.5mm pupils, however, this was not correlated with refractive error. The increase in the magnitude of the microfluctuations while viewing a low luminance target (0.002cd/m(2)) may be due to a shallower contrast gradient in the cortical image, with a consequent increase in DoF. The microfluctuations also increase when viewing through small pupils (<2mm), which increases the DoF without altering the contrast gradient. The larger microfluctuations found in the MYOs consolidates the theory that MYOs have a larger DoF than EMMs and therefore have a higher threshold for retinal image blur.