The problems in this study include the limitations of the right to integrity in moral rights concerning freedom of expression and the comparative protection of Moral Rights in Indonesia, France, America and Germany. This study is a normative juridical method with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and a comparative approach using primary materials, secondary materials and tertiary materials. The research specifications used are analytical descriptive. The technique of collecting data uses the library research method. The results of the study indicate that there is a limit for users in using the Work of others following Article 27-29 of the ITE Law and the principle of fair use in the provisions of Article 43-50 Copyright Law 2014, and in other clauses using Three-Step Test Analysis (TST). Comparing moral rights protection in Indonesia, France, America, and Germany show equality in regulations due to ratifying the Berne Convention. The fundamental difference is seen in the arrangements in the United States, which focus more on the principle of expediency (Creator Economic Rights) than Moral Rights as in the performance of the State of Indonesia, France, and Germany.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.