No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Objective: The aim of our study was to analyze the role of perineural invasion (PNI) as a predictive parameter of outcome after radical prostatectomy (RRP) in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa) and to assess its possible correlation with other well-known prognostic features. Patients and Methods: At our institution between January 2000 and December 2007, we prospectively collected data from 251 consecutive patients with pathologically localized PCa after antegrade RRP. In our analysis 239 patients were included. PNI was defined as adenocarcinoma within the perineural space adjacent to a nerve. We evaluated the biochemical progression-free survival rate using the Kaplan-Meier method to establish the correlation between PNI and prognosis, the log-rank test to verify the statistical significance, and χ² test to investigate the correlation between PNI and other clinicopathological parameters. Results: We found intraprostatic PNI in 157 patients (65.7%). The PNI rate was 73% (149/204) in pT2b–c vs. 26% (8/35) in pT2a surgical specimens (p < 0.001), and it was 78.5% (73/93) in patients with a Gleason score of 7–10 vs. 57% (84/146) in a Gleason score of 2–6 (p < 0.01). The mean follow-up was 65.4 (median 62, range 24–118) months. Overall, 11/239 (4.6%) patients presented biochemical recurrence after surgery and 7 (63.6%) of these patients showed PNI, but this was not statistically higher than in patients free from progression (150/228, 65.7%). The actuarial biochemical progression-free survival rate for all patients was 96.9 and 93.5% at 60 and 84 months, respectively, and the stratification based on the presence or absence of PNI did not allow us to identify different prognostic groups. Conclusions: Perineural infiltration frequently takes part in the pathway of extraprostatic extension. In our series, patients with pathological T2 stages and PNI were found to present a higher pT2 stage and Gleason score, even though our early biochemical-free outcome was not significantly higher than in patients without PNI.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate how serum testosterone level (T) can affect urinary continence and erectile function in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). We included 257 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, those who had filled out preoperative quality of life questionnaires (University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)), and those who had T and total PSA sampled the day before surgery. We calculated correlations between T and age, body mass index (BMI), PSA, urinary function or bother (UF, UB) and sexual function or bother (SF, SB) and IIEF-5 in the whole population and in sub-populations with normal (X10.4 nmol l À1 ) and low (o10.4 ng ml À1 ) T using Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients. We evaluated differences in these parameters between patients with low and normal T using the unpaired samples t-test and Mann-Whitney test, and finally the correlation between UF and SF, UB and SB, and between PSA and T in the overall population, and separately in patients with low and normal T using the Pearson's correlation coefficient. Mean preoperative T was 13.5 nmol l À1 and 23.7% of patients presented a low T. Mean age, mean BMI and mean preoperative total PSA at RP were 64.3 years, 25.9 kg m À2 and 9.0 ng ml À1 , respectively. BMI was negatively correlated with T in the overall population (r ¼ À0.266; P ¼ 0.02); moreover, patients with normal T presented lower BMI compared with patients with low T (25.7 vs 27.6: P ¼ 0.02). We found a significant correlation between SF scores and T in patients with normal T (r ¼ 0.1777: P ¼ 0.05). SF was significantly higher in patients with normal T compared with those with low T (74.8 vs 64.8: P ¼ 0.05). Furthermore, UF and UB were significantly correlated with SF (r ¼ 0.2544: Po0.01) and SB (r ¼ 0.2512: P ¼ 0.01), respectively, in men with normal T. Serum T was significantly correlated with PSA in men with low T (r ¼ 0.3874: P ¼ 0.0029), whereas this correlation was missed in the whole population and in men with normal T. The correlation between preoperative PSA and T in men with low T is in agreement with the 'saturation' model proposed by Morgentaler. The correlation between basal T and preoperative erectile function and urinary continence underlines the importance of assessing T before RP.