Tuned Mass Dampers (TMDs) are widely used for the control and mitigation of vibrations in engineering structures, including buildings, towers, bridges and wind turbines. The traditional representation of a TMD is a point mass connected to the structure by a spring and a dashpot. However, many TMDs differ from this model by having multiple mass components with motions of different magnitudes and directions. We say that such TMDs have added mass. Added mass is rarely introduced intentionally, but often arises as a by-product of the TMD suspension system or the damping mechanism. Examples include tuned pendulum dampers, tuned liquid dampers and other composite mechanical systems. In this paper, we show how a TMD with added mass can be analyzed using traditional methods for simple TMDs by introducing equivalent simple TMD parameters, including the effective TMD mass, the mass of the equivalent simple TMD. The presence of added mass always reduces the effective TMD mass. This effect is explained as a consequence of smaller internal motions of the TMD due to the increased inertia associated with the added mass. The effective TMD mass must be correctly calculated in order to predict the TMD efficiency and in order to properly tune the TMD. The developed framework is easy to apply to any given general linear TMD system with a known motion. Here, we demonstrate the approach for a number of well-known examples, including tuned liquid dampers, which are shown to use only a small fraction of the total liquid mass effectively.

No abstract

Mass dampers are widely used in engineering applications. We consider the effects of limitations on the damper amplitude. Using simple methods to analyze very general mass dampers, we find an upper limit to the damping. The maximum damping logarithmic decrement is δmax = 4μα, where μ is the mass ratio, and α isthe amplitude ratio of damper to structure amplitude. The result is further discussed in relation to Tuned Mass Dampers (TMDs), which can performvery well if there is enough avaliable space. In practice, amplitude limits always apply, and our result can be used to relate these to the damper performance.Our result also applies to active devices, which have to obey the limit mentioned above. Simulated tests of TMDs and other mass dampers are described. The damping is measured both by decay tests and by forced motion test. The methods agree well in the amplitude-limited regime. In other cases, decay tests are difficulet to interpret, indicating that one needs to be very careful whenmeasuring damping of 2DOF systems based solely on decay tests. We hope that our result may inform the selection and design of mass dampers in the future, where one should consider amplitude limits as the very first step.