Purpose The diurnal efficacy and safety of the fixed combinations of latanoprost/timolol given once daily vs dorzolamide/timolol given twice daily in primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertensive patients. Design A double-masked, two-centre, crossover comparison. Results In 33 patients, the mean diurnal IOP (0800-2000, measured every 2 h) for latanoprost/ timolol fixed combination was 17.372.2 mmHg and for dorzolamide/timolol, the fixed combination was 17.072.0 mmHg (P ¼ 0.36). Additionally, there was no statistical difference for individual time points following a Bonferroni correction. A bitter taste was found more frequently with the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (n ¼ 6) than the latanoprost/ timolol fixed combination (n ¼ 0) (P ¼ 0.040), while the latanoprost/timolol fixed combination demonstrated more conjunctival hyperaemia (n ¼ 9) than the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (n ¼ 2) (P ¼ 0.045). One patient was discontinued early from the dorzolamide/ timolol fixed combination due to elevated IOP. Conclusion This study suggests that the daytime diurnal IOP is not statistically different between the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination and latanoprost/timolol fixed combination in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.