No abstract

ImportancePreclinical data suggest that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have synergistic activity when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); however, it is unknown which tumor types or molecular subtypes may benefit from this combination.ObjectiveTo investigate responses associated with the combination of avelumab and talazoparib in different tumor types and/or molecular subtypes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this phase 1b and 2 basket nonrandomized controlled trial, patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in the following cohorts: non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); DNA damage response (DDR)–positive NSCLC; triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2)–negative, DDR-positive breast cancer; recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (OC); recurrent, platinum-sensitive, BRCA1/2-altered OC; urothelial cancer; metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC); DDR-positive mCRPC; and BRCA1/2- or ATM-altered solid tumors. Data were analyzed between June 17, 2021, and August 6, 2021.InterventionsAll patients in phases 1b and 2 received avelumab plus talazoparib.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe phase 1b primary end point was dose-limiting toxic effects. The phase 2 primary end point was objective response, measured as objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included safety, time to response, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival, time to prostate-specific antigen progression and PSA response of 50% or greater (for mCRPC), cancer antigen 125 response (for OC), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and biomarkers.ResultsA total of 223 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [11.0] years; 117 [52.5%] men) were treated, including 12 patients in phase 1b and 211 patients in phase 2. The recommended phase 2 dose was avelumab 800 mg every 2 weeks plus talazoparib 1 mg once daily. In phase 2, the ORR was 18.2% (95% CI, 5.2%-40.3%) in patients with TNBC; 34.8% (95% CI, 16.4%-57.3%) in patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC; and 63.6% (95% CI, 30.8%-89.1%) in patients with platinum-sensitive, BRCA1/2-altered OC. Responses occurred more frequently in patients with BRCA1/2-altered tumors. Durable responses were observed in patients with TNBC (median [range] DOR, 11.1 [3.4-20.4] months); HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC (median [range] DOR, 15.7 [3.9 to ≥20.6] months); and BRCA1/2-altered OC (median DOR not reached; range, 5.6 to ≥18.4 months). The most common grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events were anemia (75 patients [33.6%]), thrombocytopenia (48 patients [21.5%]), and neutropenia (31 patients [13.9%]).Conclusions and RelevanceThis nonrandomized controlled trial found that ORRs for avelumab plus talazoparib were comparable with those with PARP inhibitor or ICI monotherapy. Prolonged DOR in patients with TNBC; HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC; and BRCA1/2-altered OC warrant further investigation in randomized clinical trials. These data highlight the importance of prospective patient selection in future studies of ICI and PARP-inhibitor combinations.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03330405

Cancer progression is associated with activation of blood coagulation. Blood coagulation process, platelet hemostasis and hemorheological properties were evaluated in patients with solid tumors (n = 27) before and after surgery and in healthy control (n = 20). The main features of blood coagulation process in cancer patients were elevated intensity and shortened period of contact phase of coagulation and inhibited fibrinolysis stage. Such prothrombotic state was fixed before surgery as well as in early postoperative period in spite of preventing thromboprophylactic treatment. Platelets depletion within the high level of spontaneous and ADP-induced platelet aggregation was fixed in cancer. The main cause of blood viscosity decrease in cancer patients was dramatic fall of Hct, because blood viscosity adjusted by Hct 40% was increased owing to the rise of plasma viscosity and substantially worsened RBC microrheological properties. The results of our study indicated close correlation between hemorheological and hemostasis parameters; these interrelations were more numerous and strong in cancer. In cancer patients the combination of a high aggregation activity of platelets, reduced number of erythrocytes (Hct), an increase of RBC aggregation and plasma viscosity caused impairment of blood oxygen transportation efficacy that provoke hypoxia in the microcirculation favoring thrombosis, settlement of tumor and metastasis.

No abstract