The study was done with the aims to evaluate the accuracy of nasal endoscopy as compared to computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and to evaluate the correlation between Endoscopy Score and CT Score. It was a cross sectional study. Every consecutive, symptomatic patient of CRS who fulfilled the criteria of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Task Force were included in the study. Rigid diagnostic nasal endoscopy (DNE) was done and Lund-Kennedy scoring system was used. Plain CT of paranasal sinuses was done on the same day and severity was assessed using Lund-Mackay scoring system. Results were analysed considering CT as a gold standard. Out of 54 study patients, 45 (83.33%) had abnormal endoscopic examination while 50 (92.59%) were showing positive CT scan. Sensitivity and specificity of DNE against CT scan were 94% (95% CI 81.43-98.33%) and 75% (95% CI 42-99.24%), respectively. The positive predictive value was 98% and negative predictive value was 67%. Correlation between Lund-Mackay overall CT and Lund-Kennedy Endoscopy Score was high [Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) = 0.881, value< 0.0001]. The conclusion was drawn that, endoscopy is valuable in individuals with symptoms consistent with CRS and can be used to confirm the diagnosis and to know the severity of the disease. CT scan can be advised in those with high clinical suspicion of CRS but negative endoscopy and in those having persistent symptoms after optimum medical management requiring Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.
The aims and objectives of the study were to compare the rate of graft uptake after type 1 tympanoplasty in wet and dry ears and also to compare the postoperative hearing improvement in wet and dry ears. It was a Non Randomized Experimental Study. This study was done in ENT OPD at Tertiary Health Care Institute of Central India. It was conducted from November 2012 to October 2014 on 86 patients having Safe Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media. The patients were divided into two groups as Dry ear group and Wet ear group. Dry ear group included patients whose ear was dry for at least 6 weeks prior to the surgery. Wet ear group included patients who had minimal mucoid discharge in the middle ear which on culture and sensitivity showed no microorganisms. Type 1 Tympanoplasty was done in all patients. Results were analyzed statistically. Complete graft uptake was seen in 86.95% cases of Dry ear group and 80% of Wet ear group and the difference was statistically insignificant. Hearing improvement was achieved in 80% cases in dry group and 67.5% cases in wet group. The difference in hearing improvement in both groups was also statistically insignificant. So conclusion was drawn that, presence of minimal mucoid ear discharge at the time of surgery does not affect the success rate of Type 1 Tympanoplasty.
Introduction Hoarseness is a symptom with a varied etiology ranging from inflammatory condition, benign lesions to malignant lesions. Benign conditions are more common than malignant. Proper knowledge of clinical profile and evaluation is necessary to treat the cause. Objective It was conducted with the aim to study the clinical profile of patients with hoarseness of voice. Materials and Methods It was a descriptive cross-sectional study of 2 years conducted at Department of ENT at Tertiary Health Care Hospital, India. Patients aged above 10 years presenting with hoarseness of voice were included in the study. After detailed history related to sociodemographic particulars, clinical examinations including Hopkin’s rod examination in all patients and direct laryngoscopy, and radiological and histopathological examination were performed whenever indicated. Results Out of total 100 patients, maximum patients (32%) were in the age group of 21 to 30 years. There was slight male preponderance with male:female ratio of 1.17:1. Laborer (29%) was the major group affected in terms of occupation. Most common predisposing factor was smoking (35%). Commonest etiology for hoarseness of voice was chronic laryngitis (20%). Conclusion Hoarseness of voice as a symptom should never be ignored as its etiology may range from simple infection to malignancy. At our tertiary care center majority of patients come from rural area. Most of the etiological factors found in our study were treatable medically or surgically. Early diagnosis is the key to improve the outcome of treatment.
Introduction In a series of day care office procedures, techniques like fat plug myringoplasty and Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) cauterization are becoming increasingly popular for managing small central perforations now-a-days[Office1] . These are minor, cost effective procedures and have success rates that match success rates of conventional tympanoplasty[Office2] . The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial, was to compare the effectiveness of fat plug myringoplasty and chemical cauterization in the management of small centrally located perforations of the pars tensa. Materials and Methods The study was carried out over a period of 2 years on 62 patients selected from ENT OPD in our tertiary health care setup of central India. All the selected patients were grouped into two using a random allocation software EPi Info7.1.1.14. Group A included those who underwent fat plug myringoplasty while group B were those who underwent TCA cauterization. Results At 6 months follow up there was closure of perforation in 29 out of 30(96.6%) patients of group A and 29 out of 32(91%) patients of group B. In both groups success was defined by closure of perforation. Comparison of results was done using Fisher Exact Test. The difference between the success rates of the two procedures was statistically insignificant with p value of 0.6624, indicating that both the office procedures are equally effective and can be used according to the needs of the patients. Conclusion These office procedures can revolutionize the protocol of tympanoplasty which has an obvious higher morbidity and more days of absenteeism as compared to these minor procedures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.