This study uses a production organization perspective on the process of creating content in the form of fatwas on Instagram accounts in Indonesia. During the rise of “online muftīs” through various social media platforms, this study describes the process of producing and disseminating fatwa content published by “online muftīs” on islami.co, bincangsyariah.com, and rumasyho.com. This research combines field research methods and content analysis as analytical methods. In the research, the writer acts as a follower to observe, reconstruct dialogue, describe, and document information and activities virtually. Then the results of the analysis are described descriptively. This study concludes that the creation of digital content in the form of online fatwas released by islami.co, rumaysho.com, and bincangsyariah.com on Instagram is motivated by several factors, namely the manager’s background, methodology for taking fatwas, and questions asked by followers in the media. social. The leaders and editors of the three media outlets issue fatwas by adapting, simplifying, and restating existing ulema’s fatwas to be published on social media in the form of short videos or infographics.

This study aims to analyze the concept of rehabilitation of addicts at BABESREHAB BNN Lido West Java so that obstacles and challenges in the implementation of rehabilitation for narcotics addicts can be identified with the help of empirical normative analysis. This research also aims to analyze the actualization – in social rehabilitation, especially the mental coaching room. This research was a legal research with an interdisciplinary socio-legal study. The author uses this study model in order to describe legal issues more meaningfully from both a theoretical and practical point of view. This research was conducted at the Rehabilitation Center of the National Narcotics Agency (BABESREHAB BNN Lido West Java) Lido because this rehabilitation institution is a large rehabilitation center directly owned by the government, which was suspected to have made a major contribution to the success of rehabilitation in accordance with applicable laws and policies. This study also uses a mixed methodology consisting of reviewing legal documents and government policies and institutions under it, focus group discussions, and semi-structured interviews. This study also uses an ethnographic content analysis approach known as Ethnographic Content Analysis (ECA). Research informants consisted of 7 practitioner staff and 4 informants from rehabilitation residents. This study concludes that rehabilitation in Indonesia still requires attention from all parties, government, private, and family in solving all obstacles and challenges in its implementation. The allegation that the Lido National Narcotics Agency Rehabilitation (BABESREHAB BNN Lido West Java) which is directly controlled by the government, has contributed greatly to the success of rehabilitation in accordance with the law, applicable policy, as well as - not yet fully confirmed. This study found several problems in the implementation of rehabilitation, namely, (1) there is no reach out for prospective rehabilitation residents, (2) there are still dilemmas in forced rehabilitation, resident motivation, and vocational training (3) limited number of functional personnel, (4) lack of awareness legal and policy context, (5) Islamic mental development curriculum is not yet comprehensive.

Abstract.The decision of the Supreme Court Number 46 P/HUM/2018 has triggered the division of the legal paradigm in Indonesia. The philosophical discourse between justice, certainty, and the legal use in the reality of Indonesian law reflects the strong grip of legal positivism that resides in the Supreme Court's decision and causes a waning sense of justice and public hope to obtain a track record of candidates who are proper and with integrity. This study aims to explain the philosophical dialectic between justice, certainty, and legal use in PMA No. 46 of 2018 while expressing a representation of justice, construction of legal certainty and legal use that is incarnated according to the judge's consideration in the decision. The approach through justice theory John Stuart Mill and John Rawls will be used to slice the conception of justice, certainty, and legal use that resides in the decision of the Supreme Court Number 46 P/HUM /2018. This research is a normative-philosophical legal research. The results showed that the construction of justice imprinted in the verdict tended to project the concept of justice as equality (justice as fairness) from John Rawls, this can be seen from the consideration of judges contained in decisions emphasizing individual freedom (political rights, elected and elected) as a form of efforts to strengthen libertarian rights or natural rights that cannot be negated by the freedom of others. The aspects of legal benefit and certainty reflect the grip of the positivistic paradigm in law. This is reflected in two lines of consideration, firstly there is no consideration of the common interest (the greatest benefit) in the decision which is a test stone to see the implications of the prohibition norm for former convicted corruption for the future of parliament and the regeneration of people's representatives. Whereas the aspect of legal certainty in the decision only touches the legal realm as lex and negates the ontological basis of the law as an ius which is full of consideration of morality and justice ideas without trying to reveal what is behind the text (meta-teleological aspects) PKPU No. 20 of 2018. Thus, three legal values (certainty, legal use, and justice) should have an equally important position within the framework of the state legal system. When all three are in conflict, the central role of the judge's duty to equally apply the three legal objectives.Keywords: Justice, certainty, legal use, Law, Supreme Court Decision.

No abstract

No abstract